Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 23, 2020, 12:24 a.m. No.9285314   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5467 >>5500 >>5636 >>5727 >>5873 >>6235 >>9219 >>5561

Re-post from the end of last bread-

 

TO ALL UK ANONS

A UK Anon is working on a big London pics decode that he plans to drop on the General Research board. This will have anons scrambling for information on the make-up of the British Government that goes much earlier than all of the current focus on 2015/2016.

You might want to start looking at the composition of the British Government during the first term of the Hussein administration (2008 to 2012) and into the first part of his second term (2013/2014). Become familiar with PMs, Foreign Secretaries, Intelligence heads, etc.

If you want to be the “belle of the ball” or if you always wanted to be that anon who has all the info when other anons who are unfamiliar with the UK are starting to ask questions about the London pics, then I recommend UK anons start digging on the players from that time. Let’s show folks in the General thread what the UK thread can do.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 23, 2020, 12:51 a.m. No.9285467   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9285314

PM David Cameron

Foreign Sec’y William Hague

 

Start with these two.

 

Things to look at:

Middle East policies

Iran- US Iran $ deal

Syria- coup, civil war

Cyprus- money laundering

Russia- Spy poisonings

Afghanistan- opium $

China/UK deals

Et al.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 23, 2020, 3:17 p.m. No.9291106   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9286068

>William Hague was First Secretary of State & Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs.

>WH is/was a very evil man. We're talking bad shit.

 

Repost from the end of last bread:

 

https://youtu.be/owduty0Eupc

 

P Andrew and FS Hague glowing over HRC. Andrew joked that mum told him to give the honor to (BC’s wife) HRC. Coincidence it is Andrew? Does BC have dirt on Andrew? Hague just loves HRC.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 23, 2020, 4:44 p.m. No.9291823   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Excellent vid of PICCADILLY CIRCUS approach and turn-around! Approaches and does a walk-around of our favorite TICKET KIOSK. Excellent vantage points not seen on other vids. At around 3:00 thru 6:00.

 

https://youtu.be/FyxW7-kLU4s

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 23, 2020, 7:54 p.m. No.9293683   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3703

>>9293369

And that just involves a US election from 2015 to 2016. But why is Q conflating pics from Winter 2013/2014 with Spygate/Russiagate/Fisagate?

Q says “Joint-Treason”. As regards an election meddling in a foreign country, is it really treason? I think anons can come up with a bible of compiled occurences of governments meddling in foreign elections. Basically, it’s not an act of treason.

But how can an act of treason be “JOINT-TREASON”? If my country assists another agency/admn(we are talking about legally elected and appointed members of a foreign govt. - and not cigar-chewing revolutionaries) to commit treason against their own country, is that treason against my own country? Is Q engaging in melodrama? Okay, now if Q is not exaggerating, and if there is such a thing as joint-treason, then how can there be a joint-treason? Well, the simplest explanation might be if both sides’ bad actors(without their governments’ permissions) by an act of cooperation, committed an act of treason against BOTH of their countries at the same time. Is that what occurred in 2013/2014?

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 23, 2020, 8:20 p.m. No.9293958   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4318

>>9293723

On second thought, if real, it proves British Govt. asked all the proper permissions. At worst, a case of malfeasance to not check Steele’s info. But an act of treason? When you have President and Sec.State Rice asking to renew a spy order? Not even close.

So, Q’s “joint-treason” description of the affair is bullshit. EXCEPT, that Q has dangled pics clearly from Winter 2013/2014. This still leaves the door open. We need to look at 2013/2014.

 

If fake, who gains by trying to post a fake communique proving cooperation with a legit, duly elected Five-Eyes foreign government?

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 23, 2020, 10:24 p.m. No.9294884   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4908 >>4918 >>6810 >>1151

>>9293890

At this point, I can see possible treason in the US side but not by the UK.. I can imagine GCHQ must have procedures whereby any given request to spy on a Five Eye member must come with an affidavit attesting that the foregoing facts and affirmations are deemed true to the best of affiant’s knowledge along with some sort of pre-arranged authentication.

 

An unlawful US effort to spy on its own citizens would be discovered and exposed with serious consequences. It’s not that the US involved GCHQ that is a problem. In a normal, legal US cointel op against a US citizen, they would involve GCHQ. Could be they were hiding an illegal op as a legal op. Even if I was a corrupt SIS actor and was approached by US intel to do a spy op on a US citizen, all I need is for them to male it look good by submitting a request. It’s their business how they get authorization on their side. Why is the UK so sensitive in the subject? If there was an irregularity on the part of the UK, what desperation would make GCHQ go out on a limb? Why would both sides NEED or feel that they needed to do everything they could to help HRC to win? Did they have a shared secret that would be safe with HRC in office?

 

Simple blackmail of a Royal? Or part in a US/UK treasonous scheme that goes back whose continued secrecy required a specific US presidential candidate win the 2016 election.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 12:43 a.m. No.9295561   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5564 >>4586

>>9285314

Before Robert Hannigan, and more contemporaneous with our 2013/2014 London surveillance pics, was Iain Lobban.

 

“in NOVEMBER 2013 in the wake of the global surveillance disclosures by the former American National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden, Lobban and the other heads of the British intelligence agencies, Andrew Parker of MI5, and John Sawers of MI6 appeared before the Joint Intelligence Committee.[3] During his questioning by the committee Lobban said that "I do not look at the surrounding hay" referring to the metadata collected by GCHQ.[3] Lobban said that the disclosures had been discussed by terrorist groups in the Middle East and Afghanistan.[3] The effect of Snowden's revelations would make GCHQ's task "…far, far harder in the future".[3] Snowden's extensive disclosures revealed details of GCHQ's recent activities and capabilities, including the Tempora electronic surveillance program, GCHQ's tapping of international fiber-optic communications, and the NSA's payment to GCHQ over £100 Million between 2009 and 2012.[5]

 

It was announced in JANUARY 2014 that Lobban would stand down as GCHQ director before the end of the year.[1] Lobban's American equivalents, the head of the National Security Agency, General Keith B. Alexander, and his deputy, John C. Inglis, also stood down from their posts in 2014.[1] He formally retired on 24 October 2014.[6]

 

After retiring from the government, Lobban went on to advise the AUSTRALIAN government before joining the advisory board of private security firm the Holdingham Group, which is now known as HAKLUYT & Company.”

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iain_Lobban

 

Funny that Hakluyt has offices right next to Hyde park.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 5:01 a.m. No.9296448   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6489 >>6458 >>6553

>>9293694

Using a low res, just did a kind if compass bearing from my vantage if standing with 32 to my left. An arrow from my position to 18 passes right thru 29! Very exciting, anon! Kept extremely cropped but you know of which I speak.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 8:05 a.m. No.9297551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7704 >>8070

>>9296810

Most definitely possible. Highly probable. Hussein was was all-in for “Remain”. My theory is all of this mutual spying stuff is “technically” legal depending on the nation’s laws and all the US congressmen and senators on their respective intelligence committees know about the spying. If they had a problem with it, they would have ended it long ago. For the US, there still needed to be a reasonable suspicion (aka predication) to request the information from the UK. However, in the UK, the laws against searches are different. They covered their tracks(disguised their intentions) well enough so that you can’t prove they were fishing for dirt on Trump and trying to tarnish his image and to pin a suspicion on him as a Russian collaborator. Good luck proving bad intentions.

Some FBI are gonna be charged with abuse of power or lying to get a warrant, but not treason. Just guessing that if there is, or was, a treasonous act as Q says, it occurred prior to all of that. That’s why we are looking at a new timeframe of 2013/2014. The theory being that the prior act of joint-treason (UK/US blackhats) was in danger of being found out if anyone but HRC was elected. You can ask why their secret would be safe with HRC.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 8:28 a.m. No.9297762   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7807 >>7893

>>9297453

Happened to do a walk-about in the catalog and our current neighbors in AUS, GER, NZ, and FRANCE have all received visits of 124, 52, 28 and 17 respectively. Make if it what you will. It’s not just here nor is it just English-speaking threads.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 10:02 a.m. No.9298475   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8604 >>0132 >>1118

>>9298070

Sorry didn’t mean to come off as a know-it-all. But am just getting strong feelings(no not psychic, but disappointment) that the FBI and DOJ have already laid enough smoke so they can say they were “just following the facts”. They are trained how to lie from the start. The really really really interesting thing that even Q has acknowledged is that they have so much capability to spy that they have more illegal knowledge of crimes than they can “legally” prosecute. (They know more than they should). If that didn’t make sense, let me try again by way of example. If you illegally overheard that Mafia guy killed someone, how do you go about getting that guy for his evil deed. The process is called “parallel construction”. Police do use it. It is creating an ostensible “probable cause” for an arrest with the actual intention of “discovering” the real crime you already knew about. Is it right? Q calls it using “open source”, finding things “organically”. I am doubtful about anons’ actual contributions. Sorry, very cynical today.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 1:48 p.m. No.9301118   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1397

>>9298475

Thank you, anon. Just a thought, but look early in Q drops. A plan 3 years in the making, begun 3 years before DJT was asked to run for President. Did some final straw, some precipitous act of calumny cause those good patriots in both the US and UK services to say, “No more!”? Our timeline for when Q hints patriots joined for humanity’s sake would be 2013 or even earlier. The London pics are all from Winter 2013/2014. Now that’s a fun speculation. Godspeed, anon.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 2:36 p.m. No.9301643   🗄️.is 🔗kun

And where is our videographer? Let’s hope he is doing something fun IRL. Or putting the final touches? We can hope!

 

And 16 user IDs? Come on UK! The Germans have around 105 user IDs and like 56 breads!

 

Well, the quote, “Never have so many owed so much to so few,” comes to mind. We need posters. Bletchley Park had 10,000! Well, we have our resident faggot at least.

 

Invite your parents to come on.

Well, this anon is toast. Did an all- nighter. Gonna leave you patriots with an old song I posted on the end of last bread but you might have missed. Cheers, anons.

 

https://youtu.be/WAaxkAgVkHQ

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 2:36 p.m. No.9301646   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1695

And where is our videographer? Let’s hope he is doing something fun IRL. Or putting the final touches? We can hope!

 

And 16 user IDs? Come on UK! The Germans have around 105 user IDs and like 56 breads!

 

Well, the quote, “Never have so many owed so much to so few,” comes to mind. We need posters. Bletchley Park had 10,000! Well, we have our resident faggot at least.

 

Invite your parents to come on.

Well, this anon is toast. Did an all- nighter. Gonna leave you patriots with an old song I posted on the end of last bread but you might have missed. Cheers, anons.

 

https://youtu.be/WAaxkAgVkHQ

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 2:36 p.m. No.9301650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1887

And where is our videographer? Let’s hope he is doing something fun IRL. Or putting the final touches? We can hope!

 

And 16 user IDs? Come on UK! The Germans have around 105 user IDs and like 56 breads!

 

Well, the quote, “Never have so many owed so much to so few,” comes to mind. We need posters. Bletchley Park had 10,000! Well, we have our resident faggot at least.

 

Invite your parents to come on.

Well, this anon is toast. Did an all- nighter. Gonna leave you patriots with an old song I posted on the end of last bread but you might have missed. Cheers, anons.

 

https://youtu.be/WAaxkAgVkHQ

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 7:42 p.m. No.9305355   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6424

>>9285500

 

“Sawers was announced as chief of the Secret Intelligence Service on 16 June 2009, succeeding Sir John Scarlett. He took up his appointment in November 2009.[1] In July 2009 his family details were removed from the social networking site Facebook following media interest in the contents.[20][21] On 10 and 16 December 2009 Sawers gave evidence to The Iraq Inquiry.[15][22] In July 2010 his salary was revealed to the public to be in the range of £160,000 to £169,999.[23]

 

During the Syrian Civil War Sawers supported the Chief of the Defence Staff General Sir David Richards in drawing up plans to train and equip a Syrian rebel army of 100,000 to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad, as an alternative option to the government’s plan for limited direct military involvement. The plans were rejected by the UK National Security Council as too ambitious.[24] Ultimately on 29 August 2013, Parliament refused to support the government's plan to participate in military strikes against the Syrian government.[25]

 

Sawers announced his intention to stand down from running the Secret Intelligence Service by November 2014, the fifth anniversary of his appointment.[2] He was replaced by Alex Younger.[26]”

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sawers

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 10:17 p.m. No.9306627   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6694

>>9306553

Yes, was very confused by that until I spent a whole day on TripAdvisor looking at people’s holiday pics. It’s some sort of modular, I would imagine rubber material, sheets. You can see attachment points in some pics. I imagine it keeps things safe and not muddy in rainy weather. Hope that helps. If you meant something else, just ask.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 24, 2020, 10:45 p.m. No.9306789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6818 >>6931 >>6949

>>9306659

Sorry pics were deleted for good. Never thought someone would want to see them. I was trying to find pics of those signposts. Found a couple but back then was hoping it had the year visible somewhere but no luck.

So there are currently 5,580 pics on TripAdvisor. Will try narrow search.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 25, 2020, 1:23 a.m. No.9307463   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9307275

Sorry have on TripA this whole time. Damned site is unable to narrow search. Must go reverse chronological from 2019. Damn thing freezes at around 2916 and had bumped me back to square one fifteen times ar least, because I am a stubborn bastard snd love my punishment. Sorry. Maybe it’s because I am phonefagging everything. Sorry ss far as that goes. Maybe I am scrolling too fast but I just can’t do it anymore.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 25, 2020, 2:01 a.m. No.9307596   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7627 >>6418

>>9306694

Absolutely necessary? You have continuity even if you feel tou might not have a confirmed match of the two of the people have their heads cut off in the first pic.

(You asked why perhaps that is so. It may the “cameraman” is trying to hide that he is taking their picture.)

But not to worry, You still have the same 2 ladies trying to read the signpost/guide in both pictures. (Or are they really having difficulty reading the map?) If you look at the wide angle pic showing the Wilde Maus, there seems to be a group of perhaps young asian women in the right foreground. It’s hard to fiocus on but the cameraman has caught only the forehead of one of those women in the foreground. This new group who has entered the frame and the fact that the first couple have now decided to take a selfie with his camera.(Hardly noticeable if not for the odd way the man is holding his left hand- in pic one is he is holding a selfie stick.)Can’t see his camera in the bad light and fuzziness, but he def. has a selfie stick in his left hand in the first pic.

Anonymous ID: 6c80a4 May 25, 2020, 2:10 a.m. No.9307627   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6418

>>9307596

Sorry it’s late. Typing incoherent. Just saying some time has passed. Yet the signpost ladies are taking quite a minute to read that sign. Coincidence the young woman had them lined up in her picture of the man with selfie stick? One could ask who is taking pictures of whom? Just a thought.