Update on Nunes suit v. CNN from UndercoverHuber
Bottom line is Nunes erred in not requesting retraction to false story within 20 days, may be limited in damages and may have to refile amended complaint. Nunes did not dot every i and cross every T.
CNN seemed to 'skillfully' misreport to harm Nues, but covered it very well.
Parnas lawyer seems to have lied to CNN, who then reported the lie (all too common huh?)
Huber says not looking real good.
My opinion is this:
The fact that Parnas lawyer lied is now in court records because CNN stated they reported what Parnas said.
If Durham, etal, are looking into collusion there exists here a trail, Parnas was a good guy me thinks and like MF with his intial law firm, the lawyers are comped.
A pattern on lawyers working for DS and against their clients is emerging and that is a Real Problem!
So I am hoping a greater conspiracy is revealed.
So perhaps this was THE PLAN to begin with?
CNN request honored to move venue to SDNY.
https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1263983000355852289