This anon is right: >>9288864
There is a direct link to an offi-site gallery that contains all images Q has ever posted Full-sized. It also contains all the images in anons' posts that Q responds to (so is not Q exclusive). The spreadsheet also has direct links for these as well, in the same gallery.
Gallery: https://postimg.cc/gallery/29wdmgyze/
Spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g
Hope that helps.
Archivefags: making our data accessible to all, multiple formats & platforms, intentionally redundant for safety.
It's for posterity and anyone who needs it right now
If the viewer doesn't see any facts in that, then what good is it? It's pretty, but I don't see any facts on it…
Biowarfare using "disabling agent" is far preferred over those causing death.
If many die quickly, it is obvious and an antidote or countermeasures can be put in place quickly to stem the loss.
If a disabling agent is used, there are multiple benefits:
1- takes out some healthy population that would otherwise oppose you (military, those able to join mil)
2- messes up your opponent's economy (workforce decreased)
3- messes up opponent's military sourcing (items not made by mil)
4- additional allocation must be made to care for the ill (more workforce taken out / reallocation of other resources)
5- not readily apparent it is a bioweapon and thus the time between discovery of that fact and actual antidote/cure/avoidance measures ensures greater hardship for your opponent
You can see why it is preferred.
I don't think we (the public) can access them. "Journalists" pay to access it and have logins via their particular employer.
I don't know anything about code or hacking, myself.
The point of the exercise with the Anderson Cooper photo with his printout on his coffee table was for us to figure out how the 4am talking points were delivered. Gannett, if you remember? He had printed out something from their portal for "journalists"
>some blah blah blah
So basically, your statement
>I make all of mine with facts.
was false. That's fine, art is pretty, but it's not accurate to say that the particular ones you posted in this thread have any facts on them.
That is all.
You have a good Saturday, too!
Go see what we already dug up first, it may really inspire you and hopefully you can take it further than we were able to!
I'm not scolding you. I was confused when you said you make all yours with facts, so I asked, and you clarified, thank you.
>I'm in 'when is dinner mode'
Ah, hangry, I understand now.
>so you do it, OK
I make many. Different graphics in different styles for different purposes. It's a beautiful thing, no?