>all I see on this board
Then you are not looking very hard :)
Have you been here when someone was suicidal? When someone mentions that they quit drugs and have been clean for X months? When someone's relative dies?
If not, you have not seen the true heart of anons here.
That was really good, I wish they didn't cancel it.
Follow-up found the answer! Thank you, anon.
I'm glad you don't paint all with that brush. I filter certain posters automatically because it is not worth my time (just don't announce). Freedom is messy and free speech results in ugly things being said. Just like IRL, just don't engage. Find the positive/interesting and engage with those instead. Otherwise those who come here to troll (many confuse for shills) and actual shills will have accomplished their goal.
I'm not sure I'm following this - so because Durham is using "a bunch more resources" Wray has to step up and do a front-end investigation?
Which one is worried about toeing the line? Wray? If so, I'm not getting why (because Durham is using more LEO resources?)
Ok, so I'm the only one for whom it was not immediately apparent.
There was much discussion last night about both Sessions and Wray and whether or not Q's instruction to trust them was disinfo/misdirection or both men are playing their roles they way they are supposed to.
Activist judges in a different way.
Fuckery for sure.
Scavino tweet DOWN TO 1 FLAG
I don't know who she is and I've never seen that name discussed here neither night nor day shifts.
MicRot is branching out to randos out there who say stuff and using that to tie to everyone.
Desperate.