John Ratcliffe DNI assumes office May 26, 2020.

2nd Time is a Charm!

Timeline and significance:

1- DNI position created by legislation as a result of 9-11.

Senators Dianne Feinstein, Jay Rockefeller and Bob Graham introduced S. 2645 on June 19, 2002.

2- Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Hacked May-July 2019.

Discovered July 2019.

SC and JS Surveillance ended July 8, 2019

3- Q 3525 July 27, 2019 [ 93 dk]

4- Trump announced on July 28, 2019, that he intended to nominate Ratcliffe, and that Coats would depart on August 15.

5- Ratcliffe withdrew after Republican senators raised concerns about him.

6- Q 3570 Aug 1, 2019 [C]oats before [D]eclas.

7- Q Dark Aug 2 - Nov 1, 2019

8- Coats out as DNI August 15, 2019.

9- On February 28, 2020, President Trump announced that he would again nominate Ratcliffe to be Director of National Intelligence The Senate approved his nomination on May 21, 2020. Starts May 26, 2020.

Potus get Ratcliffe in after initial opposition.

WH MIL Spec DISA comms hack uncovered July 2019

JS and SC freed from 'leaker' program surveillance, Q July 8, 2019

Potus announces Coats out

Q goes dark for 93

Put 1+1 together and Coats was likely caught surveilling Pouts, Q and journos JS and SC by compromising WH MIL protected comms. This was likely at request of Nancy and Schifty who prolly worked with Coats to catch leakers (Q & Journos) OH The Irony. Q is most likely a fully sanctioned intel, Cointel Op and in this instance designed a [Trap] for just this purpose of removing DS shadow Gov. Potus had already given Barr declas ability so the leaker program was found and terminated because it was not properly predicated and Coats who signed off was shown the door.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51580925

need some feedback and criticism if warranted on this theory

1- Sullivan is comped, appeals court is comped and impartial justice as required by the Constitution/Bill of Rights is not possible in Civilian Courts.

2- Many crimes have been exposed and need to be judged impartially, but courts as evidenced by Sullivan are politically biased against Potus and for Democrats.

3- Kavanaugh questioned by Graham during confirmation about Civilian vs. Military jurisdiction.

4- After everything we have witnessed unfold in terms of a compromised Legal System, MF lawyers working against Flynn, and recently Parnas lawyer lying to CNN about Nunes and then the lie being aired, which came out in his case against CNN, as well as the recent Sullivan antics, and Roger Stone biased jury and Judge, Is there a way for impartial and unbiased Justice?

5- YES! Q tells is how in Q26

Think about it logically.

The only way is the military. Fully controlled.

6- May not be a matter of choice anymore, especially now that the crimes we need to address are that of paramount National Security in holding potential Traitors involved a conspiracy to overthrow Potus accountable.

So my Theory:

11.3 in Q 26 specifically is Kevin Clinesmith.

Q implied first indictment was going to be a Major Shock.

A major shock NOT because who it is issued to, but Who issues it.

Chess references by Q tell us the first indictments will not be major pieces in the game.

The SHOCK will be That MILITARY TRIBUNALS issue the indictments to FISA conspirators starting with Kevoin Clinesmith (11.3).

Sounds far-fetched, but think about it and read Q26.

Think about it logically.

The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker).

Biggest advanced drop on Pol.

>>9290984

>You have 2% of the population making 37.5% of all political donations.

Are people truly donating or Investing when the scale is that considerable?

Good business people Invest, they generally do not donate (give).

>>9290490

That was absolutely masterful.

Best presser of of ALL TIME!

I cannot imagine how proud Q and Q+ were when the viewed it.

I am so proud of her!

It's a long weekend, you guys have three days to follow up on those questions and I certainly hope the next time i ask some hands go up

>>9290989

>time to act

As in MIL jurisdiction?

What can Barr do legally because judge assignment seems to be the roll of a dice, event he ones we think may be impartial do not seem to be.

Shit even Powell wrote a book about Sullivan, praising him.