Anonymous ID: dfa4ec May 23, 2020, 3:39 p.m. No.9291305   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dr. Steven Phillips, MD debunks The Lancet's newest hit piece on HCQ

 

https://twitter.com/StevePhillipsMD/status/1263899565654265857

 

Another poorly designed interpretation of a #HCQ data set for #COVID19. A larger poorly designed "trial" only leads to larger erroneous conclusions. For analysis, see the thread

 

 

Steven Phillips, MD

@StevePhillipsMD

·

May 23

The authors provide almost no data to assess disease severity at baseline between groups. They rely on qSOFA which in a study in Annals of Intensive Care, was found to be "…not appropriate to identify Covid-19 patients to have poor outcomes…" 👇

 

Critically ill SARS-CoV-2-infected patients are not stratified as sepsis by the qSOFA

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

Steven Phillips, MD

@StevePhillipsMD

·

May 23

And they don't say who got what other antiviral, grouping 3 different ones together. Big confounders. Except anyone who took remdesivir was excluded from the analysis. Why? Don't want to risk it being associated with a bad outcome in a faulty study?

 

Steven Phillips, MD

@StevePhillipsMD

·

May 23

I agree with one thing the authors said: "Randomized clinical trials will be required before any conclusion can be reached regarding benefit or harm of these agents in COVID-19 patients."

 

Actually, #HCQ RCT's have been done & they show benefits, but we need more of them.

Anonymous ID: dfa4ec May 23, 2020, 3:56 p.m. No.9291422   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Good to see UK Patriots exploring legal ways (based on the Magna Carta and other documents) of resisting illegal lockdowns and vaccination orders.