BAKER
Original source listed under the video description is unavailable. The site recognizes it in a search but no access to article. NewsNow.co.uk
Luckily it was republished elsewhere:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-13/john-kerry-spotted-secret-meeting-iranian-officials-bolton-threatens-eu-firms
That doesn't even make any sense.
That's great news. Music to my ears!
RICE'S attorney claims the timestamp on her email to herself is "inaccurate" but then drops the subject completely. He never details what the 'accurate' time stamp would be…
CURIOUSER AND CURIOUSER…
Very helpful for archivist, ty anon.
I find it really odd that there is no curiosity about this really weird thing Susan Rice's attorney wrote.
No curiosity.
No followup.
WTF is going on here?
OK, so we know Susan Rice sent a memo (email) to herself on inauguration day. It was redacted to hide the involvement and knowledge of OBAMA and that he initiatied the actions spying on Flynn.
Once her email was declassified and the attention began, RICE'S attorney put out a statement which included the CURIOUS LINE about the "time stamp" on that email to herself being "inaccurate".
How can that be?
If the time stamp for that email is "inaccurate" WHY?
Was there some problem with the system that made all emails on that day "inaccurate"?
If there was a problem with the email system, did anyone report it?
Did the problem ONLY happen to SUSAN RICE?
WHAT WAS THE CORRECT TIME STAMP?
Her attorney did not offer the correct time stamp.
WHY NOT?