> What if Flynn is one of the major players
I think so, too.
If he gets back into action, it's game over for them. They know this.
That's probably why obama was compelled to give instructions on how to proceed, via that other leak.
> What if Flynn is one of the major players
I think so, too.
If he gets back into action, it's game over for them. They know this.
That's probably why obama was compelled to give instructions on how to proceed, via that other leak.
That's what I think. Remember, obama admin got rid of Flynn.
He became a threat to them, and obviously still is.
Why?
"Stefan Halper, who worked for three Republican presidents and was a longtime informant for the American intelligence community, had a February 2014 encounter with Flynn at a London intelligence conference. Halper became so alarmed by Flynn's close association with a Russian woman that a Halper associate expressed concerns to American authorities that Flynn may have been compromised by Russian intelligence."
According to former DIA official W. Patrick Lang: "Flynn incurred the wrath of the White House by insisting on telling the truth about Syria … they shoved him out. He wouldn't shut up."
> Doesn't really matter when they free the General…
Then why obama's "leak"? and why all the ensuing gay faggot asshattery by the judge?