Anonymous ID: cd07a9 May 25, 2020, 12:04 a.m. No.9307211   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7314 >>7464

Riding the State Unemployment Fraud ‘Wave’

 

When a reliable method of scamming money out of people, companies or governments becomes widely known, underground forums and chat networks tend to light up with activity as more fraudsters pile on to claim their share. And that’s exactly what appears to be going on right now as multiple U.S. states struggle to combat a tsunami of phony Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) claims. Meanwhile, a number of U.S. states are possibly making it easier for crooks by leaking their citizens’ personal data from the very websites the unemployment scammers are using to file bogus claims. Last week, the U.S. Secret Service warned of “massive fraud” against state unemployment insurance programs, noting that false filings from a well-organized Nigerian crime ring could end up costing the states and federal government hundreds of millions of dollars in losses. Since then, various online crime forums and Telegram chat channels focused on financial fraud have been littered with posts from people selling tutorials on how to siphon unemployment insurance funds from different states.

 

Yes, for roughly $50 worth of bitcoin, you too can quickly jump on the unemployment fraud “wave” and learn how to swindle unemployment insurance money from different states. The channel pictured above and others just like it are selling different “methods” for defrauding the states, complete with instructions on how best to avoid getting your phony request flagged as suspicious. Although, at the rate people in these channels are “flexing” — bragging about their fraudulent earnings with screenshots of recent multiple unemployment insurance payment deposits being made daily — it appears some states aren’t doing a whole lot of fraud-flagging.

 

A still shot from a video a fraudster posted to a Telegram channel overrun with people engaged in unemployment insurance fraud shows multiple $800+ payments in one day from Massachusetts’ Department of Unemployment Assistance (DUA). A federal fraud investigator who’s helping to trace the source of these crimes and who spoke with KrebsOnSecurity on condition of anonymity said many states have few controls in place to spot patterns in fraudulent filings, such as multiple payments going to the same bank accounts, or filings made for different people from the same Internet address. In too many cases, he said, the deposits are going into accounts where the beneficiary name does not match the name on the bank account. Worse still, the source said, many states have dramatically pared back the amount of information required to successfully request an unemployment filing. “The ones we’re seeing worst hit are the states that aren’t aren’t asking where you worked,” the investigator said. “It used to be they’d have a whole list of questions about your previous employer, and you had to show you were trying to find work. But now because of the pandemic, there’s no such requirement. They’ve eliminated any controls they had at all, and now they’re just shoveling money out the door based on Social Security number, name, and a few other details that aren’t hard to find.”

 

CANARY IN THE GOLDMINE Earlier this week, email security firm Agari detailed a fraud operation tied to a seasoned Nigerian cybercrime group it dubbed “Scattered Canary,” which has been busy of late bilking states and the federal government out of economic stimulus and unemployment payments. Agari said this group has been filing hundreds of successful claims, all effectively using the same email address. “Scattered Canary uses Gmail ‘dot accounts’ to mass-create accounts on each target website,” Agari’s Patrick Peterson wrote. “Because Google ignores periods when interpreting Gmail addresses, Scattered Canary has been able to create dozens of accounts on state unemployment websites and the IRS website dedicated to processing CARES Act payments for non-tax filers (freefilefillableforms.com).”

https://itsecurity.org/category/scattered-canary/

Anonymous ID: cd07a9 May 25, 2020, 12:28 a.m. No.9307293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7307 >>7314 >>7320 >>7464

Mueller prosecutor held secret meetings targeting Paul Manafort before Russia probe: IG

 

Former Trump-Russia prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who emerged last week as a fundraiser for Joseph R. Biden, is a sidelight in the Justice Department inspector general’s report on FBI wiretap abuse. The Weissmann story by Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz deals with a group of Justice Department and FBI personnel who met secretly during and after the election to try to rev up a stalled money laundering probe into Paul Manafort, briefly Donald Trump’s campaign manager. Mr. Weissmann, special counsel Robert Mueller’s former top gun, is hosting a virtual Biden money-raising event next month, a role stirring talk that he may win a top Justice spot if the presumed Democratic nominee is elected president. He also appears as a legal analyst on MSNBC, where he has given advice on how to oust President Trump.

 

As told by Mr. Horowitz, the anti-Manafort gaggles attracted the leading players in the Trump-Russia saga: FBI agent Peter Strzok; his then-lover, bureau counsel Lisa Page; and Bruce Ohr, then an associate deputy attorney general. Mr. Ohr became a freelance courier for a variety of anti-Trump claims from dossier-writer Christopher Steele and his handler, Glenn Simpson at Fusion GPS. Mr. Horowitz veered into the Manafort matter because Mr. Weissmann, Mr. Strzok and others kept their meetings off-limits to the department’s political leaders, during both the Obama and the Trump administrations.

 

They also didn’t inform the chief of Justice’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section, which had custody of the Manafort probe. Kendall Day, who ran MLARS, said the group had an “unusual level of interest” that could be interpreted as targeting Manafort for “inappropriate reasons.” Criminal Division assistant AG Leslie Caldwell, one of those kept out of the loop, told the inspector general that the group’s secrecy was “a little bit paranoid.” In all, the story shows that Mr. Weissmann focused on Manafort months before he joined the Mueller investigation, in which he successfully prosecuted the political consultant. Kevin Downing, Manafort’s attorney, told The Washington Times that had the Russia probe not come along, his client had a good chance of resolving any tax issues with a non-criminal settlement. Manafort had met with the FBI and turned over his financial documents. But the Russia election interference probe sealed Manafort’s fate. Besides his work for Mr. Trump, Manafort had earned big bucks as a consultant to a Russia-friendly political party in Ukraine. That resume prompted Mr. Strzok to add Manafort to a target list with three other Trump associates in August 2016, after he opened a counterintelligence investigation called Crossfire Hurricane. It is unclear whether Weissmann and his Justice Department allies knew from Mr. Strzok that the FBI already had opened Crossfire when they met in October, November and early 2017.

 

It became moot the following May. Mr. Mueller set up shop, and Manafort came along with the deal, as did Mr. Weissmann as a senior prosecutor. Back in the fall, the Manafort club included Bruce Swartz, a deputy assistant attorney general in the Criminal Division, and Zainab Ahmad, a division counsel who also joined the Mueller unit. Said the Horowitz report: “The meetings involving Ohr, Swartz, Ahmad, and Weissmann focused on their shared concern that MLARS was not moving quickly enough on the Manafort investigation and whether there were steps they could take to move the investigation forward. The meetings with Strzok and Page focused primarily on whether the FBI was aware of the Manafort investigation so that it could assess the case’s relevance, if any, to the FBI’s Russian interference investigation.”

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/may/24/top-mueller-prosecutor-andrew-weissmann-focused-pa/

Anonymous ID: cd07a9 May 25, 2020, 12:31 a.m. No.9307307   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7314 >>7464

>>9307293

 

Continue:

 

Mueller prosecutor held secret meetings targeting Paul Manafort before Russia probe: IG

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/may/24/top-mueller-prosecutor-andrew-weissmann-focused-pa/

Anonymous ID: cd07a9 May 25, 2020, 12:41 a.m. No.9307341   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7397 >>7464

Democratic clerk charged with altering nearly 200 midterm elections ballots

 

A Democratic city clerk in Michigan who had been honored by the state party for her work was charged this week with multiple felonies related to charges of altering absentee ballots. Sherikia Hawkins was arraigned Monday in Southfield, Michigan, on six counts related to the 2018 election including forging public documents and misconduct in office and was released on $15,000 bond, according to National Review Online. “The alleged misconduct was discovered after the Oakland County Clerk’s Office noticed that 193 voter files had been changed to reflect that the voters failed to include a valid signature or return date, when all of the implicated voters had in fact included both items. The county clerk’s office later discovered the original voter files in the trash at the election-division office,” National Review wrote. Ms. Hawkins is on paid administrative leave from her post as city clerk for the Detroit suburb until the trial reaches a conclusion.

 

“The Michigan Democratic party honored Hawkins this year with the prestigious Dingell/Levin award at its annual Legacy Dinner in Detroit, and she was included in the Michigan Chronicle’s ‘40 under 40’ list in 2017,” NRO writer Jack Crowe wrote. Citing her LinkedIn profile, NRO noted that Ms. Hawkins had served as city clerk in nearby Pontiac in 2010 when Democrat Gary Peters, now a U.S. senator, narrowly won a House race over Republican Rocky Raczkowski. During that Tea Party wave election, Mr. Peters won the 9th Congressional District seat by less than 6,500 votes, or 2.4 percentage points. Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel and secretary of state Jocelyn Benson said in a public statement regarding the charges against Ms. Hawkins that no election outcomes were affected by the purported ballot-tampering. Both women are Democrats.

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/24/sherikia-hawkins-southfield-city-clerk-charged-alt/