Anonymous ID: 2649a4 April 6, 2018, 9:56 p.m. No.931338   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1513

>>930876

>>931181

>>931210

It looks like the info maybe false. I believe rense.com thinks Q is a fake and he does not like elite Jews, but he does have some good info. I will look further into this.

http:// rense.com/general96/rousefbi.html

 

 

FBI Agent In Charge, Las Vegas,

Not Married To Podesta's Daughter

 

10-11-17

 

Megan Podesta's husband's name is Gordon Rouse, Not Aaron Rouse

 

Gordon went to UCSB and is an engineer in Milpitas, CA

 

Here is a photo of Megan Rouse, daughter of John Podesta, with her husband, Gordon and children.

They live in Dublin, California. There is a photo of FBI Agent Aaron Rouse further below.

Anonymous ID: 2649a4 April 6, 2018, 10:27 p.m. No.931740   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1767 >>1774 >>1909 >>1916

https:// twitter.com/Cernovich/status/982411781778751488

 

Mike Cernovich

🇺🇸

‏Verified account @Cernovich

 

The Miami Herald joined my lawsuit to unseal records in the Jeffrey Epstein case.

 

Hate all you want,

 

  • but I'm doing litigation in federal court as part of my journalism.

 

Their brief is here: https:// www.cernovich.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Miami-Herald.pdf

Anonymous ID: 2649a4 April 6, 2018, 10:36 p.m. No.931870   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1909

>>931774

Page 6 of 21 of pdf

Pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Miami Herald Media

Company (the "Miami Herald"), and Julie Brown, investigative journalist for the Miami Herald

("Julie Brown" and together with Miami Herald, the "Intervenors"), respectfully submit this

memorandum of law in support of their motion to intervene and unseal all of the documents in the

above-captioned action that have been filed under seal or redacted. These judicial documents are

germane to the Miami Herald's ongoing coverage of dozens of underage minors who were victims

of Jeffrey Epstein, the South Florida financier who pleaded guilty in 2008 to solicitation of minors for prostitution and was suspected of involvement in a larger sex-trafficking organization. These documents are presumptively public, under both the common law and the First Amendment to the

United States Constitution, but have been sealed pursuant to an improvidently granted protective

order (ECF No. 62) (the "Protective Order") that allowed the parties to the above-caption actions

("Parties") to designate information as confidential without the particularized judicial scrutiny

required by the law prior to sealing. Though two previous motions to unseal have been denied,

the reasoning underlying the denial the imminence of trial, and potential impact on a jury is no

longer relevant because the case has been settled.