We're moving on, Gerbil-san.
What is it exactly that you feel in your bones, anon? Do you care to explain for us clueless anons who aren't privy to your feels? (I'm asking you to verbalize)
Instead of repeating what I have previously said, let's pursue the line of inquiry more deeply.
The WH press sec had asked:
-
Why was Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn unmasked by Obama's chief of staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others? #Obamagate
Now let's dig into this.
–Did they suspect Flynn of collaborating with an adversary?
–Or was it a fishing expedition hoping to find dirt on Trump so they could interfere with his presidency?
–Were they trying to create a cause of action for the eventual appointment of a special counsel to continually investigate a President (and his NSI, Flynn) who had done nothing wrong?
–What happened that caused 39 officials to request the unmasking of Flynn?
–How did they all learn (who told them?) that Flynn was a target?
To get to the bottom of "who told them", we need to understand WHEN exactly did these unmasking requests occur (dates)? The answer is found here:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/flynn-unmaskers-what-happened-what-means-fred-fleitz
"…[The list was released on May 13th of] 39 top Obama officials who made 53 requests to unmask Lt. Gen. Flynn’s name from intelligence reports [dated] Nov. 8, 2016 [thru] Jan. 31, 2017. While many of the requesters were Obama political appointees who resigned by Jan. 20, 2017, some were career officers at CIA, the Pentagon and other agencies. The most stunning thing about this list is that the vast majority of these requests were dated between Dec. 14 and 16, which was before Flynn’s Dec. 29 phone call to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. [Recall the significance of that call:] An NSA intercept of this phone call was the basis of the Jan. 24, 2017, FBI interview with Flynn when two FBI agents used this intercept to entrap Flynn into lying about the call." …
So we are looking for some kind of meeting or document or testimony that would tie these 39 officials to the initiation of the 39 Flynn unmasking requests.
I picked an article and it happens to be a good one. Pic related.
Are you following me, anons?
This discovery about the unmasking requests mostly occuringDec 14-16, 2016BEFORE FLYNN'S PHONE CALL WITH THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR KISLYAK (upon which the FBI interrogated Flynn and eventually framed him)
tends to corroborate our concept that OBAMA HIMSELF INITIATED OR DIRECTED THE SPYING ON FLYNN, and that the Oval Office meeting that Susan Rice belatedly documented with an email to herself AFTER TRUMP'S INAUGURATION may well be where/when it occurred.
Following?
Richard. NEVER EVER post your name or email address here. This is a dangerous cyberwarfare zone.
Reported for self-dox.
Thanks for that.
In that case, we need to try and ID a different meeting or document that took place on or shortly before Dec 14, 2016.
Multiple lines of attack going on parallel
to weaken the MSM and weaken the
[C]'s confidence in MSM's veracity.
Anons are relentless.
Different anons pursue different lines of attack, simultaneously.
>OBAMAGATE
Great meme and thinking, anon.
I didn't even see your post before writing mine, kek.
Instead of just screaming Demand Answers, why don't we dig into it and keep asking more and more probing questions, that will be impossible for MSM to answer, and will light the spark of truth in normie minds?
Let's dig into question #4.
>4. Why did James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice privately ADMIT UNDER OATH that they had no evidence of collusion, WHILE SAYING THE OPPOSITE PUBLICLY?
Is it perjury to lie to a Congressional committee?
Did these individuals give sworn testimony before Congress? When?
Are the transcripts public? Where?
Can we identify where in their sworn statements they denied any evidence of (Trump-Russia) collusion?
Can we identify the public statements asserting that there WAS (Trump-Russia) collusion?
If these statements differ as alleged,
is that perjury?
Is it a criminal offense?
What statute?
What's the penalty if found guilty?
This is how we do journalism, anons.