Programming.

Those who claim to care about a "higher good" by talking about political/social issues refuse to having any kind of discourse on the structure of corruption or how/why it happens.

This argument could come from any vast number of angles.

WHY is it so forbidden?

The second someone talks about why our world is in the place that it is now -

Conspiracy.

Even if it's the light stuff.

Patriots, we are having a harder time than ever.

Share with me that this is not the case - am I pessimistic?

WWG1WGA.

>>9318060

Hard to follow.

At the end of the day, there is no denying the -possibility- that this could have been planned.

How do you poison the people? Where does water come from? The oceans.

Watch the water?

From a popcontrol perspective, it would absolutely make sense. Does geological data support this?

We'll see if people report this or if it comes out in the "group consciousness."

>>9318086

I'd more attribute it to tribal mentality. "If I believe something so "crazy" then I'll be an outcast and unheard," (correct), "so I'm not even going to entertain it."

>>9318098

>.gov

What should we be looking for on this site?

Layperson's breakdown on why this site is an asset to patriots?

Potentially a maroon pill.

>>9318098

-same anon

I have a hard time with starting off by agreeing, because often time you're agreeing with something that you know isn't true.

Easy for some, dishonest in nature (in a sense - at least difficult from a "karmic standpoint" if that makes any sense).

Also have a hard time with actual evidence as even the majority of Q posts (as evident as you can fucking get) involve assumption.

Head-on attacks I generally regard as standing your ground, ei calling an endorsement of a CNN article "a danger to you and those around you by spreading a proven non-credible news source."

I realize how this "radical" viewpoint is both helpful and non-helpful.

Hard. More importantly tumultuous. Trump supporters in the early days must have bulletproof armor.

>>9318106

Good point.

Very comprehensive, randomized control trial of hydroxychloroquine done by WHO showing increased mortality among those given the drug as opposed to controls.

This study dotted all their I's and crossed all their T's.

To medical professionals this is the be-all-end-all proof. Large pool.

Quick note: They excluded THOSE WHO HAD JUST BEEN TAKEN OFF A VENTILATOR.

Not a nurse - don't know what role that plays.

This study needs to be debunked IMMEDIATELY if dishonest within the Lancet breakdown.

Funding had "no role" in the design of the study - always deniable but is there proof?

From my standpoint (as a vegan, kek all you want) I'm VERY used to studies like these being outet as excluding IMPORTANT DATA.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext

Patriots, debunk this garbage and notable it as you may. Don't see it in the notable archive, but it's also recent so idk.

>>9318201

kekkeroni salad supreme

>>9318204

God bless, patriot, and we all wish you the best of luck with your goals and self-actuality.

The truth is a powerful thing.

You may want to post this on the gratitude wall thread.

WAWY

>>9318230

Nobody knows what this shit is. Stop spamming the board, shill.

>>9318239

Don't know about that one, Chief.

>>9318232

Almost impossible to track.

Just another example of how the PsyOp against us is becoming uncontrollable.

If Q wants people to "wake up on their own by their own free will and devices," it's making believing in the white hat op extremely difficult. You can't possibly expect normies to deny a fully by-the-book Lancet study, or even expect us to deny it without a sense of blind faith. Not a Q denier, just being honest.

>>9318246

>>9318251

My mistake.

Crucial fact - an absolute red flag of a fake study: "metaanalysis."

I guess they're just reinventing the term to throw people (like me) off, because I did skim the study.

Very much appreciated, anon.

>>9318334

Fucking fantastic.

So many loopholes the average person wouldn't think of, even after being a metaanalysis subject to cherrypicking (and famous for exploitation of cherrypicking).

A subtle but powerful form of TDS at work.

How often are we tricked by people like this?

>>9318371

Again, when getting into research into plant based diets, my particular cause -

I was fucking AMAZED by the ways you can botch a study.

"Credible" randomized control muh global muh science studies would run all day long with false data - for example, one showed higher mortality rate among vegans but only included counties with extreme poverty (in other words, the wealthy were the only people who could afford said meat/cheese/eggs while the general populus ate peasant food) and the study was made possible by millions from the meat industry, didn't even try to hide it.

Us patriots know to read no further than "WHO Study" but unfortunately normies think the WHO loves them more than grandpappy.

>>9318395

>>9318405

Big Mike incoming for presidential swipe.

>>9318414

Not black, fake news, orange man bad

>>9318429

>>9318434

>>9318443

State Secrets Privilege

>do this

>muh classified

>refuse and go to prison