>>9318688

so you're saying that Taiwain is the owner of Hong Kong?

what is 'china' and who says what it is?

why do those few cuckold brat-child pig-people (the communist sex-slave-children who didn't get eaten but were allowed to butter-ball to become even plumper . . . )

I'm being fowl but my point is:

Hong Kong is Hong Kong.

Why do you get to say what else? why does your narrative about this imagined 'creature' called 'china'?

you personify something that is just there as a convenience, the idea of a 'group' who 'cohere'.

but guess what it's only real if the peole say it's real.

if the HOng Kong want to be Hong Kong why does your linguistic fetish of 'personification' of nations demand that these people must be the slaves of the butter-ball children of the communists, people who do what they are told by people who . . . guess what . . . aren't Chinese.

>>9318516 (pb)

ah, that's a proper use of 'we', discussing Q.

I think it's a good indicator that background activity is in full swing as the shills seem fully funded and in full production of their poison mind-fudge operational nonsense.

but we all know that trying to time or prophecize about habbenings is always met with disappointment.

Plus any countdown can always have a hold put on.

or if they need to they can jump the count forward.

>>9318746

leave and go to Britain and demand citizenship!

It is rather common of the Brits to abandon their citizens when crisis hits. The island of Monteserratte comes to mind.

They told the Hong Kong citizens 'oh, ya, no, you aren't british.

but anyone from Pakistan can come and have a herim in London.

So why not support the idea that all HOng Kong are citizens of Britain. And just to make it easy, say , let them vote in London.

Absantee.

it might swing the election ? ? ?

wait, this sounds unfair.

those elections probably aren't fair anyway.

but ya, the Hong Kong citizens need a way out and saying that they 'belong' to China is non productive and against the further of human dignity and Liberty.

I say let them stay where they are and have their city as it is.

Why do they need Britain? Why do they need the CCP? Why do they need Taiwain?

well of course as friends and partners in a wider world . . .

>>9319249

anon can think for themselves about what is garbage and maybe they will think of you . . .

>>9319267

in their game they only lose, anon.

if it's a crooked game it seems they win to them. But we all see that they lose.

there is no 'getting away with' what they have tried to pull off. And they can repeat their 'blah is a part of blah, it's settled law and we the kangs' handwave behaviors, and no one is putting out a loan to go into debt to have that.

we don't believe their narratives.

they can make up all the narratives that they want about themselves being blameless angels.

but we know that they don't believe in angels. And that they don't care about narratives, except to appear blameless. (meaning whatever fake is necessicary they will allow).

so they try to allow all this fake, the scaffolding of constant lies arched up higher and higher to the babble to tower above the rabble.

we see it fall into the mirk of their swamp like a castle built above a cistarn with no bottom.

they are the past anon, what ever story that they tell, it is cruft.