I love this statement from the President

We caught them. They had people that had forged documents. I would like to see it move much faster. I'll be honest with you. To me, I don't need any more information. I know, and I purposely stayed out of it. Other than I appoint people. I purposely stayed out of it. But I'll tell you what, what they've done, if this were president Obama, if this were a Democrat instead of a Republican, people would have been in jail for two years, many people would have been in jail for two years already with a 50 year term. Okay? 50 years, but we caught them. Now, hopefully Bill Barr is going to do something about it. And you know what? Other things are going to come out too.

And a lot of other things are going to come out, but you don't even need other things. What they've done is so corrupt, they've tried to take down a duly elected president of the United States, happens to be in this case, me, but we can never allow it to happen again

The whole transcript of Sharyl Atkinsons interview

http://fullmeasure.news/news/full-episodes/full-measure-may-24-2020-interview-with-the-president

Sharyl interviews doctors in Hydroxy and the doctors are pissed

Sharyl: Cardiologist Dr. William O’Neill is a medical director at the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Michigan where they’re studying both remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine.

Some people in the media are treating hydroxychloroquine as if it's something that's being pitched by charlatans, it's dangerous, and that's been debunked and discredited. What do you make of that?

Dr. O’Neill: I think that's very harmful. President Trump touted it early and so then the media set out to disprove and discredit it without any regard for science. I think those of us that are actually involved in the scientific endeavor feel that there is some value to it and it has to be tested

Sharyl: Dr. O’Neill says he’s prescribed hydroxychloroquine to help numerous coronavirus patients and saw improvement in all of them. He’s less impressed, so far, by remdesivir.

Dr. O’Neill: There's a lot of hype for the drug. I saw the original new England Journal article study and I saw the Lancet study and to me it's just like a big Ho Hum I just don't see a big benefit to it.

Sharyl: Adding to the drama and confusion, a draft version of a study was accidentally published last month showing remdesivir did not help most coronavirus patients and caused such serious side effects, 18 test subjects were taken off the drug. Gilead, the maker of remdesivir, did not respond to our interview requests but has said it ended the study because it couldn’t find enough volunteers to take part.

On May 1, the FDA seemed to give remdesivir the edge, allowing emergency use for severely ill coronavirus patients at the same time, stepping up cautions against hydroxychloroquine and its sister drug saying they should only be taken in the hospital or as part of a formal study due to reports of “serious heart rhythm problems.”

Dr. O’Neill is now leading a study to find out if hydroxychloroquine can serve a critical role as a medicine to prevent coronavirus. But he says the bad press is making it difficult.

Dr. O’Neill: Now people are scared to use the drug without any scientifically valid concern. We've talked with our colleagues at the University of Minnesota who are doing a similar study, and at the University of Washington. We've treated 400 patients and haven't seen a single adverse event. And what's happening is because of this fake news and fake science, the true scientific efforts are being harmed because people now are so worried that they don't want to enroll in the trials.

Dr. Steven Hatfill: Why are the press running medicine in the United States? This is not right.

Sharyl: Dr. Steven Hatfill is a biomedical scientist who worked on Ebola and studies pandemic responses and medicine. He says there’s an unwarranted campaign against hydroxychloroquine.

Sharyl: You think lives were lost because it wasn't used?

Dr. Hatfill: Yes, lives were lost.

He took hydroxychloroquine years ago for malaria and recently, again, to test to prevent coronavirus.

Sharyl: A preventive would mean, if it were to work, that the fear that this comes back before there's a working vaccine, the fear that we have another shutdown …

Dr. Hatfill: a return to work … early detection, return to work. Would I give it as a prophylaxis to everybody? No. But for fit, healthy, critical workers going back to work or high risk populations; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ex-smokers, diabetics, obesity …

Sharyl: Might work for them?

Dr. Hatfill: It might work for them.

Sharyl: A third scientist we spoke to, who says hydroxychloroquine has been unfairly disparaged, is Dr. Jane Orient, head of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.

How do you account for the difference in medical and scientific opinion about this drug? Because some people seem so certain that it can be a positive benefit to coronavirus patients, maybe even crucial in the early days, whereas some people are convinced it should absolutely not be used.

Dr. Orient: That's a very good question. But the ones who have the most experience are very enthusiastic about the possibilities. And we do have naysayers that we suspect may have a little conflict of interest because they are so enthusiastic about remdesivir, which is a new drug that hasn't been approved for anything. And that so far is showing a really very equivocal or even negative results.

http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/hydroxychloroquine

>>9318704

Moar from the doctors interview

Sharyl: All three scientists criticized that VA report casting doubt on hydroxychloroquine as little more than a list of cases with crucial details missing. It turns out one author of the report received research funding from Gilead, the maker of remdesivir, including a 247-thousand dollar grant in 2018.

Orient: I think we have to look at the money. There's no big profits made in hydroxychloroquine. It's very cheap, easy to manufacture, been around for 70 years. It's generic

Remdesivir is a new drug that could be very expensive and very lucrative if it's ever approved. So I think we really do have to consider there's some financial interest involved here.

Dr. Hatfill: Some of these decisions did not seem to be rational. And when things, in my opinion that are so clear, the right path to take aren't taken, very often: Money is somehow involved

Sharyl: When it comes to money, we checked financial ties among experts on the government panel devising coronavirus treatment guidelines— which had the effect of dialing back hydroxychloroquine use and giving an edge to remdesivir.

We found that of 11 members reporting links to a drug company, nine of them named relationships to remdesivir’s maker Gilead. Seven more, including two of the committee’s leaders, have ties to Gilead beyond the 11 months they had to disclose. Two were on Gilead’s advisory board. Others were paid consultants or received research support and honoraria

Nobody reported ties to hydroxychloroquine which is now made by numerous generic manufacturers and is so cheap, analysts say even a spike in sales would not be a financial driver for the companies.

In the end, politics and money aside, at least some scientists aren’t ready to count hydroxychloroquine out of the coronavirus equation. Even if others already have.

Sharyl: Is it possible that it's not one or the other— that hydroxychloroquine could be used in a certain setting, maybe for preventive if you find out that works, and the other drug could be used in other settings?

Dr. O’Neill: No, Absolutely. I think, I think that it's just still very early in this disease process that we're going to learn lot. There's 600 studies that are being done in the United States right now on Covid to see all sorts of different kinds of infections and combinations. We're going to be a lot smarter at the end of the summer. So I think what I would just say to everybody, just hold your powder.

We wanted to hear perspectives from from Dr. Fauci and Gilead, the maker of remdesivir, but they declined our interview requests. We also contacted numerous scientists who have criticized or are skeptical of hydroxycholoroquine, but they also did not want to be interviewed for this report

http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/hydroxychloroquine

Now we’re going to catch up with a man who may be one of the world’s most intriguing whistleblowers, he’s definitely one of the richest. He’s Brad Birkenfeld, the one-time Swiss banker who turned evidence against U.S. tax evaders only to find the U.S. Justice Department targeting him. Today, his Unfinished business

Old interview but interesting and Clinton State Department refused to comment

Sharyl: Brad Birkenfeld was a manager at Switzerland's largest bank, UBS.

Brad Birkenfeld: I managed offshore money for wealthy clients. Minimum account size was a million dollars and the sky was the limit.

Sharyl: In 2007, Birkenfeld became one of the first bankers ever to break open legendary Swiss bank secrecy. Exposing one of the longest and largest tax frauds in the world: 19,000 illegal offshore accounts with $20 billion in assets managed through the UBS American desk.

Birkenfeld: What we would do is we would set up accounts for Americans in Geneva or Zurich where they had a numbered account and they wouldn't pay any capital gains tax, no income tax, no inheritance tax, and Swiss bank secrecy allowed no one to look at that account. Government, ex-wives, tax authorities, business partners, whatever.

Sharyl: What part of that was illegal?

Birkenfeld: Well, for Americans, having undeclared accounts was illegal. You have to declare all your worldwide income.

Sharyl: When Birkenfeld decided to blow the whistle to the U.S. Justice Department in 2007, he says he was shocked by the reception he got.

Sharyl: When you went to the Department of Justice, they treated you like the criminal.

Birkenfeld: They did. They were very hostile. The moment I walked in there, they said I'm not a whistleblower, I'm a tipster. The hostility was so great, I asked my attorneys why am I even here? This is a waste of time. And the fact that they kept berating me and belittling me. And it's all clear now why. Because they were so incompetent to uncover the largest tax fraud that was going on underneath their nose for decades.

Sharyl: Birkenfeld says he also suspects the hostility had something to do with UBS's powerful connections among both Democrats and Republicans. The Justice Department used the information Birkenfeld provided as a whistleblower to prosecute him. He served two and a half years in prison while most of the tax evaders he exposed got off scot-free. In 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton negotiated a government settlement with UBS. The bank agreed to pay $780 million—about a billion less than Birkenfeld claims UBS made in profit from the illegal accounts. And they agreed to turn over names of just 4,700 of the 19-thousand tax evaders. Nobody explained who got to decide which names to turn over and which to keep secret.

Birkenfeld: Is it the church bingo parlor where you put your hand in the bowl and pull out numbers? I mean, who selected these names? Was it Hillary Clinton? was it the State Department? Was it UBS? And why only 4700?

Sharyl: Do we know the names of the 4700 publicly?

Birkenfeld: We do not, and we've never seen a third-party forensic accounting of those 4700 names. You pay your taxes, I'm sure your audience pays their taxes, why should these millionaires and billionaires get away with it?

Sharyl: We wanted to ask the Department of Justice, but they declined our interview request. They also declined to produce the names of the 4,700 tax evaders or explain who decided which names could be kept secret.

Sharyl: Now, Birkenfeld is naming some of the high-profile alleged account holders. In a federal lawsuit, he accuses two of them of trying to interfere with publication of a book he wrote about the whole scandal: Lucifer’s Banker. Actor Kevin Costner and Leonard Lauder, son of cosmetics magnate Estee Lauder.

Birkenfeld: I don't need the money. I don't need any attention. This is about showing the American people why does it take an individual to hold our government accountable? That's really the question here. And if you don't do it, then we have a lawless society. What's the sense of having laws if you don't enforce them?

Clinton and the State Department declined comment for our original report. Clinton had publicly defended the deal she negotiated with UBS by saying the Swiss helped the US on many difficult diplomatic fronts

http://fullmeasure.news/news/one-on-one-interviews/unfinished-business-the-whistleblower

MORE FRAUD IN OREGON: Non-Citizen Steps Forward, Tells How Oregon Automatically Registered Her To Vote Via Motor Voter Bill And Vote-By-Mail

“I just want to highlight to American citizens this does happen. I don’t know why there’s this blind belief that it cannot happen. It does happen, it happened to me,” says a woman who has come forward to tell the story about how she, as a non citizen, ended up getting registered to vote without even knowing it, and had ballots sent to her.

Ever since the advent of vote-by-mail, elections integrity activists have pointed out all the different ways that such a system could be compromised.

While rumors have circulated for years that illegal aliens and non citizens were voting, most of the evidence pointing to such has been circumstantial, with few traces of actual hard evidence.

Equally, Democrats have long praised the system of mail-in ballots, and have dismissed any concerns about voter fraud as some right wing conspiracy theory. Democrats have assured us that only citizens would be allowed to vote, and any non citizens would be stricken from the voter lists after thorough crosschecking if they tried to register.

As news of the ballot scandal continues to spread through Oregon, a new problem is rearing its head for the Democrats and those in charge of elections: A legal immigrant, but non-citizen, who is going through the process to become a citizen, has evidently been receiving ballots.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/fraud-oregon-non-citizen-steps-forward-tells-oregon-automatically-registered-vote-via-motor-voter-bill-vote-mail-video/

>>9318923

Moar from article

This whistleblower has come forward to tell her story about how she started receiving ballots in the mail, addressed to her, after she had changed her address with the DMV and postal service, both of which apparently have the power to input data that affects one’s voter registration.

She wanted to stay anonymous in the video interview, but enough paperwork was provided to validate her claims. She had no clue she had been registered to vote, never said she wanted to be registered, and no one ever asked her if she wanted to be registered. She was simply automatically registered.

Ballots started arriving in her mailbox in 2016, and continued through 2018, for a total of five elections. She says she likely would have received a sixth ballot had she not taken the steps to cancel her voter registration.

Here’s a screencap from the video showing she had been sent five ballots:

=Former CNN Digital Producer on How the Network Has Become the Anti-Trump Channel=

Steve Krakauer has done what many in the conservative news media have not: work for CNN. While not his first job in the media world, it certainly provides him much-needed insight when he crafts his newsletter, "Fourth Watch" for TheFirst on the network's fervent anti-Trump bias.

In an interview with Townhall, Krakauer explained how he sees the direction where CNN has gone since he left in the early 2010s to where it is today in the aftermath of Donald Trump becoming president in 2017.

"It seems like a very clear delineation from when the time I was there," Krakauer said, explaining his position at the network meant he was responsible for all of CNN's digital production, including "all of what T.V. looked and felt like on social media and on the website."

His time at CNN coincided with the 2012 presidential election and "I did not feel an ounce of bias one way or the other" in terms of how they covered the debates, conventions, and town halls, though Krakauer acknowledges how most people at the network were left-leaning, but "it didn't feel that way in the room."

All that changed in 2016, "where there became this feeling of this existential fight with the person in the White House… I think Trump, in a lot of ways, embraced this fight and it became a mission of CNN, I believe, to counter the presidency. And that was not there necessarily before in the feeling of wanting to counter on the other side and I think that has completely changed the output you see both on CNN, but also behind the scenes."

Indeed, Trump's criticisms of CNN, and the media at large, had been a staple throughout the campaign, but the dynamic had changed once he became the president-elect and he said the famous "You are fake news" remark to CNN reporter Jim Acosta at a press conference shortly after his victory.

One of the ways Krakauer sees how CNN has changed its programming for the worst is how almost every show host now has monologues for the anchors to give their thoughts at the beginning of their program.

"Anderson Cooper, who I think is an excellent journalist, who would travel the world to every natural disaster and warzone, he's now basically confined to a studio, and this was before coronavirus. He's in the studio every night, talking to pundits, and included in that is a monologue, is his opinion on some anti-Trump thing," he said. "That's just a very clear difference from the way things before."

Krakauer said while he likes anchor Chris Cuomo and how the network initially handled his bout with COVID-19, now that we know a lot more about his brother's, Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), disastrous handling of nursing homes and how the virus spread easily on the subway trains, which did not start to get daily cleanings until May, "it's a bit rich start with the comedy routine right now."

With Brian Stelter hosting "Reliable Sources," Krakauer said Stelter has gone from holding everyone within the media world accountable while he was running TVNewser and worked at The New York Times to barely reporting on mishaps when it does not involve conservative media.

These days, Krakauer works to hold CNN's feet to the fire, with most recently focusing on their coverage of the reopening of states during the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2020/05/25/former-cnn-digital-producer-on-how-the-network-became-the-antitrump-channel-n2569413

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/05/24/amazon-drops-a-truth-bomb-about-taxes-on-joe-biden-n2569358

The tools and plants are at again. Let’s support Kayleigh with all our night. I’m not good at memes but if you post some here, I’ll send out

Jonah Goldberg Attacks Kayleigh McEnany's Behavior Toward the Press as 'Indefensible and Grotesque

Jonah Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Dispatch, criticized White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Sunday, saying her treatment of the White House Press Corps is "indefensible and grotesque" and akin to being a "Twitter troll" who does not care about her actual job.

Fox News anchor Chris Wallace and Goldberg specifically took issue with McEnany presenting a list of questions they should be asking about the Obama administration's approach to Lt. Gen. Micahel Flynn while he was under investigation.

"I have to say that if Kayleigh McEnany had told Sam Donaldson and me what questions we should ask, that would not have gone well," Wallace said.

"Look, it’s nice to see Donna so deferential to Kayleigh McEnany. I think her behavior is indefensible and grotesque. I think that what she has done is — there’s this cliche in Washington that President Trump wants Roy Cohn as DOJ, as attorney general," Golberg said.

"What Donald Trump wants in a press secretary is a Twitter troll who goes on [the] attack, doesn’t actually care about doing the job they have and instead wants to impress really an audience of one and make another part of official Washington another one of these essential cable news and Twitter gladiatory arenas. And it’s a sign of the defining of deviancy down in our politics and it’s only going to make things worse," he continued.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2020/05/24/jonah-goldberg-attacks-kayleigh-mcenanys-behavior-towards-the-press-as-indefensible-and-grotesque-n2569373

What’s surprising about this is that ABC even took a stance, a sort Stan e to be sure.

ABC News' Pierre Thomas Puts 'Old, White, Males' Running for Office on Notice

An ABC News panel reflected on former Vice President Joe Biden's comments that someone "ain't black" if they choose to re-elect President Donald Trump. The network's Chief Justice Correspondent, Pierre Thomas, put Biden, and other white candidates, on notice.

"Note to older, white, male candidates: do not tell black people what is black enough or who is black enough. It's just not going to fly," Thomas said. "Now, I'm not sure how it's going to play. Some of the younger African American voters, they don't like this notion of how Biden speaks about black people. Sometimes they believe in some cases Democrats take black votes for granted. They're not down with that."

The truth is this: Democrats have taken African American voters for granted for generations. Democrats automatically assume that black voters are locked in place, that they don't have to do anything to win these voters over. The Democratic Party makes this assumption because they believe African Americans have voted for Democrats for so long that it's ingrained in them to vote for whoever has the D next to their name, regardless of how the candidate's policy positions will impact them.

The First Step Act highlighted injustices that Democrats – including Joe Biden – have championed over the years. When Republicans got the legislation passed and signed into law by President Trump, Democrats were baffled. Criminal justice reform was supposed to be their go-to topic that blacks agreed with them on.

Now what do Democrats have left? A candidate who can't remember what race he's running for, where he's at or who his spouse is. He makes things worse by making racist comments about the very people he's harmed in the past with things like the 1994 crime bill.

And Democrats sealed their fate when they go to bat for creepy Joe.

Yep for sure, Joe Biden has singlehandedly freed the slaves of the democrat party. Come home our brothers and sisters

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/05/24/abc-news-pierre-thomas-claps-back-at-joe-biden-over-racist-comments-about-black-n2569370

P. Diddy to Creepy Joe: I Warned You About Black Voters

Wow it’s pretty bad when hip hop artists are calling out dems==

During a late April interview with Naomi Campbell, rapper Sean "P. Diddy" Combs warned former Vice President Joe Biden that in order to secure the African American vote in the general election, he would have to work for it and prove that he is going to do something to help the black community.

"The black vote is not going to be for free. We're gonna have to see some promises. We're going to have to understand what kinda deal we're getting – what are we getting in return for our vote?" the rapper asked. "Because nothing has changed in America for black America."

"In order for us to vote for Biden, we can’t be taken for granted like we always are because we’re supposed to be Democrats or because people are afraid of Trump," Diddy explained. "It's whoever is going to take care of our community. Our vote is not for free. Whoever wants to make a deal. It's business at this point. You know, we can't trust politicians."

According to the rapper, Biden needs to make clear what he wants to do to help black America, just like President Trump made it clear he wanted to build the border wall along the United States-Mexican border.

Biden clearly didn't take the warning to heart when he made a fool out of himself on Friday, saying those who vote for President Trump "ain't black."

Combs took to Twitter to remind the former veep that he ignored the warning.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/05/23/flashback-p-diddy-previously-warned-joe-biden-that-the-black-vote-isnt-free-n2569349

Mr. President, Here's How You Stop the Democratic Scam of the Century

This is clearly a trial run by Democrats to see if they can get away with The Scam of the Century with which they have one goal in mind: to steal all future U.S. elections.

Keep in mind that even Mexico demands election integrity. Voters in Mexico must physically show up to vote. They must have federal government-issued photo identification (with thumbprint). They can't vote in English. Voting in Mexico is only done in Spanish.

In today's America, the only possible reason to be opposed to voter ID is that you want to cheat. Everyone has government-issued ID no matter how poor, no matter skin color. Everyone needs it to collect a government check welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, Obamacare. Every Democratic voter has it.

But it's no longer enough for Democrats to block voter ID. Now it's no voter ID combined with mail-in ballots. Democrats want anyone to vote from anywhere, with no election security or integrity. And to oppose this farce and fraud is racism and voter suppression.

It's all Democrats talk about. It's in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's latest coronavirus bill. Failed Democratic candidate and spokesperson Stacey Abrams says without mail-in voting, democracy is lost. Cheating Democrats are showcasing what is in their cheating hearts: a deep desire to wipe out fair elections and "the will of the people."

https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2020/05/24/mr-president-heres-how-you-stop-the-democratic-scam-of-the-century-n2569333