Anonymous ID: 7a0d95 LET'S DO JOURNALISM. May 26, 2020, 7:45 a.m. No.9319442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9464 >>9481 >>9527 >>9655

Pursuing the 5 questions that Kayleigh McEneny asked the Press on Friday. Imagine you are a journalist. How would you solve question #3?

 

3. Why was Michael Flynn's identity leaked—a CRIMINAL ACT—to the press?

 

Let's dig into this one.

–Was it legally permissible - although highly unusual and improper - for 39 officials to request unmasking Flynn's identity in intel intercepts? OK we'll skip over that for a moment.

–Once they had Flynn's identity, weren't they required to treat that info as confidential?

The answer is found in a PDF document that Q dropped here on Wed, Jul 24 2019: "PROCEDURES FOR THE A VAILABILJI.TY OR DISSEMINATION OF RAW SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION BY THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY UNDER SECTION 2.3 OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333 (RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES)". Table of Contents pics related. How unmasked identities must be treated will be found somewhere in here.

–How can we learn if leaking Flynn's identity to the press was indeed a criminal act?

–What statute or executive order or regulation governs?

–If guilty, what's the penalty?

–WHO might have leaked it? Any one of the 39 officials who requested unmasking of Flynn. Possibly anyone who worked for or with each of the 39 or had access to their confidential info.

–TO WHOM in the press was it leaked? We should be able to narrow that down by listing WHO published it first and WHEN and WHERE.

Anonymous ID: 7a0d95 May 26, 2020, 7:56 a.m. No.9319527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9655

>>9319442

Finally the biggie:

 

WHY was Flynn's ID leaked to the press?

(Considering that the leakage was a criminal act and the individual who leaked it likely knew they were breaking the law.)

 

–WHAT did that individual hope to accomplish?

–Did they leak to a known press ally, knowing that the leaked ID would be published?

–Was it to create a harsh public perception of the good General?

–Was it to "launder" the information so it would seem to come from a journalist instead of directly from an Obama WH insider?

–Was it to create a pretext for FBI interviewing Flynn?

 

We KNOW from other declassified docs that the FBI set up Flynn. They wanted to frame him. They wanted to get him to lie and get him fired.

 

–WHY did they want Flynn fired?

–HOW was Flynn a threat to their plans to usurp power and dump Donald Trump from the presidency by force? (I.e. a COUP)

 

Let's do REAL JOURNALISM.

 

The MSM is not going to answer these questions. They are too weak and stupid and corrupt. Their only motivation is to keep covering up the truth.

We need anons to step up and do REAL JOURNALISM and dig into this puzzle and keep pulling the yarn until the pieces all come together.

Anonymous ID: 7a0d95 May 26, 2020, 8:16 a.m. No.9319655   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9679 >>9783 >>0044

Anons paying attention?

>>9319442

>>9319464

>>9319481

>>9319527

 

Can anybody here PROVE that anons are stronger and more determined and more truthful than the corrupt Lamestream media?

 

Or are we all numb and mezmerized from the constant stream of bullshit?

Have we become as weak and lazy as the corrupt MSM?

 

We the People (United) have all the power.

When are we going to USE IT?

Use our voice!

Be loud!

WRITE!

 

                  • -

 

1.Why did the DoJ learn about the FBI's interest in Flynn's conversations with the Russian Amb. from a CONVERSATION WITH OBAMA in the Oval Office?

HOW did the illegal spying on Flynn originate? Strange that Obama knew of the FBI's interest in Flynn's talk w/ the Russian Amb. before the DoJ knew. DO WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IMPLIES? That the spying was directed by Obama.

 

2. Why was Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn unmasked by Obama's chief of staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others?

Let's dig into this.

–Did they suspect Flynn of collaborating with an adversary?

–Was it a fishing expedition, hoping to find dirt on Trump so they could obstruct his presidency?

–Were they trying to create a cause of action for the eventual appointment of a special counsel to continually investigate a President (and his NSI, Flynn) who had done nothing wrong?

–What happened that caused 39 officials to request the unmasking of Flynn?

–How did they all learn (who told them?) that Flynn was a target?

To get to the bottom of "who told them", we need to understand exactly WHEN these unmasking requests occured (dates)? The answer is found here:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/flynn-unmaskers-what-happened-what-means-fred-fleitz

"…[The list was released on May 13th of] 39 top Obama officials who made 53 requests to unmask Lt. Gen. Flynn’s name from intelligence reports [dated] Nov. 8, 2016 [thru] Jan. 31, 2017. While many of the requesters were Obama political appointees who resigned by Jan. 20, 2017, some were career officers at CIA, the Pentagon and other agencies. The most stunning thing about this list is that the vast majority of these requests were dated between Dec. 14 and 16, which was before Flynn’s Dec. 29 phone call to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. [Recall the significance of that call:] An NSA intercept of this phone call was the basis of the Jan. 24, 2017, FBI interview with Flynn when two FBI agents used this intercept to entrap Flynn into lying about the call." …

So we are looking for some kind of meeting or document or testimony that these 39 officials have in common - the impetus behind their unmasking requests.

 

3. Why was Michael Flynn's identity leaked—a CRIMINAL ACT—to the press?

Let's dig into this one.

–Was it legally permissible - although highly unusual and improper - for 39 officials to request unmasking Flynn's identity in intel intercepts? OK we'll skip over that for a moment.

–Once they had Flynn's identity, weren't they required to treat that info as confidential?

The answer is found in a PDF document that Q dropped here on Wed, Jul 24 2019: "PROCEDURES FOR THE AVAILABILITY OR DISSEMINATION OF RAW SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION BY THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY UNDER SECTION 2.3 OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333 (RAW SIGINT AVAILABILITY PROCEDURES)". Table of Contents pics related. How unmasked identities must be treated will be found somewhere in here.

–How can we learn if leaking Flynn's identity to the press was indeed a criminal act?

–What statute or executive order or regulation governs?

–If guilty, what's the penalty?

–WHO might have leaked it? Any one of the 39 officials who requested unmasking of Flynn. Possibly anyone who worked for or with each of the 39 or had access to their confidential info.

–TO WHOM in the press was it leaked? We should be able to narrow that down by listing WHO published it first and WHEN and WHERE.

 

WHY was Flynn's ID leaked to the press?

(Considering that the leakage was a criminal act and the individual who leaked it likely knew they were breaking the law.)

–WHAT did that individual hope to accomplish?

–Did they leak to a known press ally, knowing that the leaked ID would be published?

–Was it to create a harsh public perception of the good General?

–Was it to "launder" the information so it would seem to come from a journalist instead of directly from an Obama WH insider?

–Was it to create a pretext for FBI interviewing Flynn?

We KNOW from other declassified docs that the FBI set up Flynn. They wanted to frame him. They wanted to get him to lie and get him fired.

–WHY did they want Flynn fired?

–HOW was Flynn a threat to their plans to usurp power and dump Donald Trump from the presidency by force? (I.e. a COUP)

 

Let's do REAL JOURNALISM.

The MSM is not going to answer these questions. They are too weak and stupid and corrupt. Their only motivation is to keep covering up the truth.

We need anons to step up and do REAL JOURNALISM and dig into this puzzle and keep pulling the yarn until the pieces all come together.

 

4. Why did James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice privately ADMIT UNDER OATH that they had no evidence of collusion, WHILE SAYING THE OPPOSITE PUBLICLY?

–Is it perjury to lie to a Congressional committee?

–Did these individuals give sworn testimony before Congress? When?

–Are the transcripts public? Where?

–Can we identify where in their sworn statements they denied any evidence of (Trump-Russia) collusion?

–Can we identify the public statements asserting that there WAS (Trump-Russia) collusion?

–If these statements differ as alleged, is that perjury?

–Is it a criminal offense?

–What statute?

–What's the penalty if found guilty?

This is how we do journalism, anons.

 

'''5. Why did the Obama administration use opposition research— funded by a political organization and filled with foreign

dirt—to spy on members of the Trump campaign?'''

How do we answer this one?

a. Prove that Obama admin used opposition research

b. What opposition research? Done by whom?

c. What political organization paid for it? Proof?

d. The "info" in the fake dossier was known by the FBI to be made-up. Where did we learn this? How can we prove it to the public?

e. What role did the fake Dossier play in getting the FISA warrant(s) to spy on Carter Page and other members of the Trump campaign? Where are those documents? What is in them?

                  • -

 

WAKE UP, ANONS, DAMN IT!

Anonymous ID: 7a0d95 May 26, 2020, 8:30 a.m. No.9319768   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9813

>>9319734

It's up to We the People to expose their corrupt game.

–Identify the game

–Document it

–Create consumable information that can be disseminated

 

These are examples of how this can be done.

Looking for anons to analyze, ID what is occurring and who benefits (motivations!), DOCUMENT what you find, work to make the info simple and consumable, then DISTRIBUTE THE FUCKING INFO.

 

YOU knowing about it in your own head and complaining in a few sentences on /qresearch informs YOU, but WHO ELSE does it inform?

 

We are not doing our job.

Q needs us to get the info out to the rest of our PEOPLE.

Anonymous ID: 7a0d95 May 26, 2020, 8:59 a.m. No.9320018   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9319848

<3

In the future, I believe more and more motivated anons will pick a topic to focus on, keep their notes organized, and make it a personal priority to write a short Op Ed piece, a blog-type piece, a short article that can be published.

We have some big frens, more help than we know. It IS POSSIBLE to do these things. If we don't know how to get it published, ]they[ do know and ]they[ will help get the word out.

Thank you anon!

We are looking for more anons like you, who are willing to step up and

Make it Rain

and Be Loud.

 

If we realized how much power we have

and how to use that power, this defeat-the-deep-state thing that we all desperately want could come to fruition much faster than anybody realized!

 

The opportunity is there. We just have to pick it up and use it.

We can do this, anon.

Anonymous ID: 7a0d95 May 26, 2020, 9:04 a.m. No.9320070   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9320034

Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

 

Early Hydroxychloroquine Is Associated with an Increase of Survival in COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Study , https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202005.0057/v1

 

Early treatment of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: A retrospective analysis of 1061 cases in Marseille, France https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893920302179 , http://archive.is/VEdFi

 

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) activity. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15320751

 

Hydroxychloroquine Improves Obesity-Associated Insulin Resistance and Hepatic Steatosis by Regulating Lipid Metabolism https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689966/

 

Chloroquine Is a Zinc Ionophore https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182877/

 

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are associated with reduced cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6001837/ , Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018; 12: 1685–1695, Published online 2018 Jun 11. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S166893

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/

Chloroquine Is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread

 

Here's the new study incoming:

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-begins-clinical-trial-hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin-treat-covid-19

 

NIH begins clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat COVID-19

To keep track of the study, look here:

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04358068

 

Evaluating the Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin to Prevent Hospitalization or Death in Persons With COVID-19

Collaborator: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries LTD

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16115318

 

and

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15351731

 

Hydroxychloroquine can be prescribed to adults and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by pregnant women and nursing mothers.

https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/fsp/drugs/hydroxychloroquine.pdf

 

More pix for you NB