>>9320034 (lb)
I hate to say it, anon, but you and I seem to be fighting the same fight with frens outside of Qresearch.
Staunch critics will never get the study they are looking for, double-blind, placebo etc. What will happen is the NIH ran study will show something that fits in their narrative, and that's what's going to get published. Not sure why that needs to go through the machinations of exposure, but people on the HCQ side of things will get "proven wrong" just like in the VA sponsored study because pushing $13 dollar pills as a prophylactic/therapeutic simply isn't profitable enough.
I get the whole "show vs tell", but the problem is the folks that will always side with "science" are getting "shown" HCQ is ineffective. Sure, something could probably be done about that, but the message here isn't for the hard skeptics. It's intended to reach anons. At some point, you'll just have to concede in your debate unless, of course, someone changes that narrative.