Q 521 January 13, 2018
We are FIGHTING for LIFE.
We are FIGHTING for GOOD.
We are at WAR [@].
NOT EVERYTHING WILL BE CLEAN.
[SCARE] NECESSARY EVENT.
Do you TRUST the US Military?
Do you TRUST the Chain Of Command?
Have FAITH - WE ARE IN CONTROL.
PATRIOTS.
PATRIOTS DAY.
HAVE FAITH.
YOU WERE CHOSEN FOR A REASON.
YOU ARE BEING PROVIDED THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF INTEL TO EVER BE DROPPED PUBLICLY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
USE IT - PROTECT AND COMFORT THOSE AROUND YOU.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
Q
Potus is revealing The Counter
We can surmise that Potus will take a strong position on MSM and biased coverage going into the election season.
Let's think of some ways he may address this, he certainly has a Plan if he made a statement such as he did.
The MSM does have a legal right to be biased and opinionated in their coverage, there are no FCC, regulatory (that i know of) laws that require them to be impartial, so it will be specific to election in some manner.
Lets put out anon thinking caps on and share thoughts. I guess Barr and WH Counsel has thoroughly researched and come up with a legal defense, angle.
1- MSM coverage when not impartial certainly is a campaign contribution, campaign contibutions are regulated by who?
2- EO of 4.4.20 Foreign Participation in Telecommunications Industry? Would we look into Israeli and dual citizenship of many MSM owners?
3- Foreign 'hostile' Governments are not allowed to interfere but it seems alot of latitude is given for 'friendly governments' and their media to interfere and pick a side. Nowdays foreign media is disseminated domestically with vigor. Hopw does this apply relative to regulation? EO of 4.4.20?
4- Will China influence be scrutinized, they do not have alot of direct ownership I do not think?
5- Perhaps internet BOR as Q has referenced?
6- Regulation of portions of media as public utilities?
7- Q has said people 'sleepers' will turn on Potus, these people, etal., will opine, who is making them or influencing opinions?
8- We do not want to regulate free speech, so how do we ensure Potus and Conservatives have equal, uncensored free speech>
Please share thoughts.
Q mentioned a money trail with her Romney connections.
She seems ok many times, but is definitely activated, coerced and directed on certain issues (narratives).
Ann is not impartial she is compromised against Potus.
Ann's action over time against Potus would define her as a sleeper.