Anonymous ID: b66652 May 26, 2020, 11:53 p.m. No.9328795   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9328692

>To me, it is a form of intimidation pointing a camera at someone without their consent. And in some cases it is justifiable, but an unleashed dog? I'm thinking, no, he is acting just as much like a Karen, as any other Karen.

No.

"Kevin" was triggering her bullshit, just as men everywhere should do when faced with toxic feminism.

When faced with someone who is used to bullying, the last thing you should do is back down.

Anonymous ID: b66652 May 27, 2020, 12:04 a.m. No.9328830   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8836

>>9328609

>Any person who declines to wear a face covering because of a medical condition

Anon can immediately think of three separate "medical conditions" which would prohibit using a mask…not counting anything psychological.

 

For the purposes of the prohibition, tho, anon would simply "identify" as wearing a mask. That would we an awesome lawsuit.

Anonymous ID: b66652 May 27, 2020, 12:19 a.m. No.9328889   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9328856

>anons aren't violent

Unless cornered in a castle doctrine state, but still not usually violent.

One of anon's favorite college memories is calling 911 and saying "Hi, I'm the guy with the gun", and seeing some cultural enrichment athletes get arrested.

Who the fuck expects to commit a home invasion, then calls the cops when the occupant grabs a freedom dispenser with a 30 round mag and tells them to fuck off?

They're lucky anon was merciful.