should we appeal to the supreme court for arduous audit of all the absentee ballots?
Our President should announce:
"Yes, I've decided to implement contact tracing . . . "
hush in the crowd and shills 'see see '
then
"but only for absentee ballots. Each must be affixed with an RFID"
that would put the fear-in-em!
and then say 'and maybe it's already like that.' as a guip at a hot mic
maybe Q wants us to write letters that show how concerned we are that these elections seems un audited, and how easy it seems to us that the electins can be stolen through fraud. And we could ask governors, attorinies general, and local political operatives that we are concerned that we will be unable to verify that results of these ballots, and thus the elections, to us, will seem tainted and that . . . given all the new technology, isn't it rather add that we use the mail, when we know that if it were bills or taxes they'd say 'please use electronic transmissal'.
but suddenly we go 'paper' and retro back to 1975, when you'd get that 'do not fold spindle or mutilate' very expensive punch card which was some cretin corporations meal tickett . . . the predawn of 'contact tracking'
cool side point: the craven banking industry used that cobol 'punch card' tech for a full 30 or more years until the year 2000 scam, leaving the systems open for major fraud, which, probably, was part of their plan, end of unsauced observational history).
the problem: if we go and say 'I want to help' to monitor the election, we get put on their list.
how do we monitor anonymously? how do we tell them 'we are watching, you don't know who we are, but you better be honest' and then have a waay to do it?
if we show our faces they target us.
I know how these thug people operate. they say things like 'where do you read your news' as they nose turn and exhale
they gaslight what you know, they make up fake narrativess. And they tell some enforcer type about you, and have no fear of being a cold hearted bastard to you if you threaten their franchise.
so maybe that's why people don't write these letters.
if you are indanger of sinking it's because you stand within the quagmire of the discouragement shill.
you are in the swamp, anon. Step out of it.
we are on the rise, sinking isn't part of what we are doing here.
how dare I say 'we'?
if it bugs you :
anon are on the rise, sinking isn't part of what anon do here.
the 'stratling pronouncement of the oppositions failure with the catch phrase ending' attack thwarted.
on no the antishill twarting the false narrative.
now some one tell me I don't do enough for Q and POTUS.
In the 1990s some of the guys would watch the launches at a local feed. And during intervals the camera would be pointed at a 'capcomm', a person who had a mic, I think.
And a name tag on her desk so you could read her name.
these feeds weren't publicly broadcast, but available if you had a sat link and dialed into the channel. And then you could bridge it to the local cable through the head end. Easy to do if you know about patch panels.
anyway this poor girl would be in full view of the world, sipping her coffee, having soda and lunch, whatever. (I didn't watch her so I'm just guessing about her activities)
the boys (they were young men) wouild call her 'Cathy Capcomm'
if any of you are here to day God Bless you all.
I couldn't stay in it, it was too hard to deal with the horid hazing of bad managers . . .
I'd go back into that world again but how could it ever be?
I walked away from it for very good reason, knowing that my fate would be horid if I took their transfer.
I was hazed out of it.
I remember being at the breakfast place, before classes or between classes, we'd meet that. It was a cold day in January and they had a 'space shuttle' pin ball game in that place which no one ever played after that day.
Someone at the breakfast bar said 'Do you think that they are alright'?
When you have a crowd of engineering students what kind of response do you get to such doe eyed cluelessness.
So then, in a briefing once, a techy pointed out the launch statistics are 'one in 50'.
wouldn't you know in 50 launches (was it exactly 50) there was anohter repeat in a similar kind of disaster. It was a Saturday morning.
Let's hope they get it right and one in 50 is too high a casualty count.
if you have knowledge of a plot you are obligated to disclose it to the correct authorities, and I don't know who that is.
pray that what you suggest does not happen!