Anons: Did the Founding Fathers create for us a dilemma, a choice between becoming "a banana republic" or have a president who cannot be prosecuted for his crimes and is therefore above the law?
This is inane. Why is the exercising of jurisprudence foreclosed as an option? Why is tacit acceptance of a criminal in chief being proposed as the option required by the Constitution?
Is the Constitution really a document that empowers aspiring tyrants and gangsters?
And, praytell, have you looked around the country today? Looks more like a Banana Republic every day.
What, then, is gained by this pretense about "not prosecuting former presidents?"
It sounds like more voodoo from the Swamp.