THANK YOU KIND BAKER!
BLESS YOU SIR!
Thought I saw on the German thread that the image may be photoshopped?
REPOSTED FROM LAST BREAD
>>9306931 lb
Think I figured out why you are looking for more landmarks. 2012 plan similar to 2013 as regards OBS WHEEL, WM and DD CAROUSEL? So you an identifying fixture on the APRES?
Just noticed on the 2013 what might be our guidepost where my guidepost ladies are?
Kek!
Okay anons, if we do allow ourselves to understand that our previously accepted and agreed upon knowledge of the timeframe of the pics was wrong. And , as we now look back on previous Q posts knowing that Q did not correct us when we were WRONG ABOUT THE TIMEFRAME of the posts, we must accept the notion that maybe Q did not correct us in our presuppositions about IDENTITY OF PERSONS in those photos as well. As Q says, Disinfo is necessary. That said, we should consider that the persons might not be Peter Stzrok or Lisa Page.
Now that full skepticism is allowed, may I compare some known photos of Lisa Page with that blurry pic of a man and a woman taking pics at Winter Wonderland. Look at the WW woman’s hairline. Look at Lisa Page’s hairline in the pics. Lisa Page has a very low hairline with a widow’s peak feature that shows ip time and again in different conditions such as hair just done up, to not done up, maybe just out of the shower or on a very damp day. Ask women about how they can’t do much with their hair on damp days. Let’s take a look.
Let’s look at some more photos of Lisa Page vs woman at WW, looking at the hairline.
You asked for pics of the guidepost and.towers. This is a cap from a 2013 video. Interesting angle. And shows that kiosk at the base. So these 2 things might be those on the 2013 map. Also catches one in those tower rides in background. Not sure what all that stuff is off to right foreground and background but you will.
Interesting in that they can’t get their stories straight. Other stories even go into detail about how Stzrok’s wife found out. It sure would make it easier to put them out of each others’ lives. I had been figuring that it was impossible for them to have known each other prior to LP’s boss Priestap transferring from DOJ and taking LP(also working at the DOJ at the time). But as we all are learning about the intricacies of fed investigations, I saw a story that, while employed by the DOJ attorney, Lisa worked with the FBI. There was another story that describes Peter Stzrok as an “ex-boyfriend”. When PS and LP were first boyfriend and girlfriend could now be anytime from 2014 when she was ar DOJ and working with the FBI. This would, however be when she was already married. Again, unfortunately, this doesn’t help to eliminate them from being in the London pics. The story I read only barely mentioned the fact, seemingly trying to do damage control, and in mitigation, that PS was an ex boyfriend that she kind of made it easier for them to have another fling. So, back to square one. Oh, and a wiki type of story on Page includes her “favorite city” as London. This obviously would imply prior visits. So all we know about the pics is that they are not Crossfire-related.
P.S. Am not admitting that is Lisa Page at Winter Wonderland. I am admitting that LP could have travelled to London,. Will try to find a good resume in her. But can say that, for 2013 Winter Wonderland, LP would be working for the DOJ and not FBI. This only means different bosses, but it brings into doubt(?) a DOJ attorney taking part in a counter-intelligence operation. Such operations would be done by the FBI.
P.P.S. Forgot to say that Lisa and Peter could have been boyfriend/girlfriend from before Lisa got married. Like when she first became s lawyer. Attorneys often work at many different courthouses on different cases. She could have met him on a case in common. Haven’t gone back yet to look.
Was just feeling remiss in not providing any in my discussion. Was just thinking, Oh well. it’s documented everywhere and it’s not for me to educate anons. They will start asking the same questions we are now. But you will already have a change in thinking about the pics.
I said in a prior discussion maybe a bread or two back that I don’t think Spygate was the “joint-treason. As for the spying on Trump by the UK, they have too much cover for anyone to prove they did anything unlawful. It was on the US to provide proof of authorization and SIS/MI6 will have the requests in hand. Any other prior info sharing by the UK to the US prior can be proof of goodwill as long as they say, “Hey, we heard an unsubstantiated story about, etc” There would be no harm in that. Since we have eliminated Spygate (election meddling), them I am starting to look for the “joint-treason” angle and what that might be. Blackmail of a Royal? A selling of secrets? Both?
“Jointly and severally” refers to liability for damages. Say, two, who crashed into a store were ordered to pay a sum. If one fails to pay, the other is still responsible for the whole amount of damages even if he had paid his half of the amount already. In criminal liability, there is such a thing as accomplice liability. But we’re getting far afield discussing it. If Q is being literal about it, then it’s got to be something that should be considered treasonous in both the US and UK, done by persons from both countries. No such thing as treason against another country- only against one’s own country.
>Not strictly liegal.
Sorry missed that part of what you said. BUT, for justice to be done, someone has to find a crime occurred. Treason is a legal term not lightly applied.
Tear it up, anon!
>Keep your promise, Q said. This is not a game.
But to whom? As you know, I have my doubts. And the guy with her at the Embankment? Not looking like PS(to my eye anyway). Saw in LP bio that she srands 5’9”. Not a short woman. Look how tall that guy is next to her. Stands a foot over her. My impression of PS is he isn’t that tall. Guy kind of
reminds me of Harry. Just thinking out loud.
About your drop. I would recommend you post in the early part of the day (US) to allow post to be discussed/mentioned during the day. No doubt it will make Notables. The better anons check Notables when they log in. Yes, you cam expect anons to interrogate with usual skepticism. but that’s normal here. You will be more than prepared to answer requests for clarification. Do allocate a large amount of time, when it’s convenient for you, to be there answering questions in real-time.
“To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield"
Some points to be made about the document: It is an application for a RENEWAL of the surveillance that was ongoing BEFORE Boris took office. It implies that the surveillance had the operation had the previous and current blessing of the Hussein administration, and that the surveillance had born fruit in some way. And it represented the wishes by the US State Department that it be renewed.
As to the veracity of the document, some have observed an apparent error in the misnaming of Christopher Steele as Michael Steele. It could be an honest mistake by a bureaucrat when reviewing so many supporting documents, OR it evidence of a foul-up in creating a FAKE document. As such, the document remains unverified in the minds of anons. If you have any further information on how the doc was “released”, them please share it.
Even if the document were true, it does not mean Boris was involved in the operation. However, continuing with the assumption that it is true, one could conclude that it was leaked by the Boris Government. But anon will have to make up their own mind. Cheers, anon.
>WHO are those bombs for?
If you are only a recent visitor here, you might have missed the discussion here about a pending “drop” of information by an anon regarding the London pics. Hence, the symbolism. See above, and threads above.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/09/nsa-spies-online-games-world-warcraft-second-life
Article from The Guardian dated Dec. 09, 2013
Would (((they))) be so stupid to use game comms if they knew the comms were monitored? Taking a chance their effort would be successful? Desperate.
AS THE UK THREAD IS CURRENTLY VERY INTERESTED IN EVENTS FROM THE YEARS AROUND 2013, it should be noted that the article from The Guardian appeared on Dec. 9, 2013 while the 2013 WINTER WONDERLAND was going on.
From a Wiki on Snowden:
“On May 20, 2013, Snowden flew to Hong Kong after leaving his job at an NSA facility in Hawaii, and in early June he revealed thousands of classified NSA documents to journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Ewen MacAskill. Snowden came to international attention after stories based on the material appeared in The Guardian and The Washington Post. Further disclosures were made by other publications including Der Spiegel and The New York Times.” (End quote)
Perhaps (((they))) might have felt they needn’t be concerned about using game comms since Eric Snowden hadn’t yet blown the whistle about the game comms spying program.
It should be noted that the Guardian article about game comms mentions secret money transfers. Could an agency with police powers use knowledge about how to commit a crime to commit a crime?
>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/09/nsa-spies-online-games-world-warcraft-second-life
ANOTHER INTERESTING PARAGRAPH FROM THE GUARDIAN ARTICLE ON SECRET USE OF GAME COMMS:
“Meanwhile, the FBI, CIA, and the Defense Humint Service were all running human intelligence operations – undercover agents – within Second Life. In fact, so crowded were the virtual worlds with staff from the different agencies, that there was a need to try to "deconflict" their efforts – or, in other words, to make sure each agency wasn't just duplicating what the others were doing.” (End quote).
What they are saying is that a each spy agency then had to have an office or persons in a “deconfliction” capacity to liaise with the other agencies to let tgem know that they were running a counterintelligence op within a certain gaming community. This is very interesting. We have all seen crime movies in which an agency is investigating a crime only to be told to “stand down” because another, usually higher-up agency is running another secret op. If you are still with me, what if an agency was actually running a money-laundering operation? Continuing, what if another agency discovered some such activity and, when they asked about t, the guilty party could just say, “Oh yes, we are running a cointel op in that game.” ? Not to worry.
Thanks for the big posting, anon. Was looking thru that guys tour of 2015WW. At about 35:00 is a great shot of Wilde Maus(with no coaster seen looking thru it), then the camera pans left and no Double Decker Carousel os seen. But then, look in the distance and we see really far away, the Giant Observation Wheel. (Here in this vid->) >>9391401
Going back to look at the rest of your post. Good work. You have been busy.
One problem with this video. I don’t think it is 2015. I took a cap at the end and I see the OBS WHEEL. You and I know this is impossible if we look at the 2015 WW map. I think the problem or misunderstanding might be due to the fact it that the Yrube vid was published in January 2016 and one might assume it was from the recent 2015 WW. But in our favor, the Ytube vid does not claim to be from 2015. (See pic provided).
Anon, changing subjects for a minute: I came across this idea quite by mistake/chance. Always wondered why those folks on Victoria Embankment are crossing the road. No chicken crossing the road jokes. You have observed that the TATTERSHALL CASTLE appeared dark in the Lisa/MI6 pic. Even if those pedestrians had stayed til closing and wanted to pop over to the Corinthia because their hotel bars are open til midnight. How late does the TATTS actually stay open? Say they were there on a night that closes early, why would they wait til the employees had turned off the lights before leaving? I think not. Usually you get kicked out so the bartender/waiters/waitresses can finish their cash-register count and lock everything up. So I did a driving map route from the TATTS to the CORINTHIA HOTEL and it makes you drive all the way up the street to Richmond Terrace in order to make a U-Turn to drive back and turn up Northumberland. (See attached mapquest)
Now, what if they aren’t coming from the TATTS at all? Why are they crossing the street to go to the Corinthia? Why park in that little parking pullover lane. Is that/was it a loading area only? Even if you could park in that pull in lane, why would you when you could just pull up to the Corinthia Hotel and valet the car? Unless someone was dropping you off(see car pulled over with brake lights on) and was continuing on rather than having to make a U-turn further ahead at Richmond Terrace(this would indicate a final drop-off for the night). We’ve all been in a situation where you drop someone off on the wrong side if the street so you can continue on your way. I don’t know. Where do you park if you have dinner and drinks at the TATTS? On Northumberland? Whitehall Place? Still, seems like a large group to all be dropped off at the same hotel, though not impossible.