>>9349775

Marsh V. Alabama is the famous case to use.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/326/501/

"The First Amendment prohibits a law against distributing religious literature in a company-owned town without receiving permission from the town's management because this is essentially state action."

A private social network on the internet is thus still a public forum, and they cannot infringe on first amendment rights.

>>9349894

I need to buy more popcorn.

>>9349916

Well, he's a communist. He can't have good judgement in the first place. Its a fiduciary risk for him to even head a public company.