I hardly want to make it my purpose on this earth to joing a class-action lawsuit. But I'm willing.

Twitter has iilenced me for a long time, but they're conduct is actually much worse than that. Twitter engages in a concerted, coordinated strategy of deception and intimidation. @Jack [knowingly] allows for people like me (anon), which they perceive as a threat, to become surrounded by false Twitter profiles, which are operated by bad actors (foreign intelligence agencies?) all pretending to be your friends and followers, engaging with you to extract personal information, attempting to manipulate and control your conclusions, and ultimately threaten your life if you become too vocal about the truth. On mulitiple occassions, I had my life threatened on Twitter by these fake accounts (real people posing as "friends" and followers). The threats were often veiled, but they were clearly threats nonetheless. When I did not relent, these "followers" shared information between themselves, which I had naively shared in private messages, to piece together my personal identity and then they began phoning the threats to me at home. I reported this to the FBI but did not hear anything back. I'm not afraid of them now, but it certainly scared me at the time, and what they did was extremely illegal. I could sue Twitter for millions, because I know Jack knows about this conduct. It's too widespread on Twitter for him NOT to know about it. I wouldn't do it for the money. I'd do it to reveal the truth. I'm never going to forget what you have done @Jack. Just the start, because you have done so much worse to so many others. WE KNOW. Pray for the victims.

Now just keeping a cautious eye out for a non-comped lawyer who would take on such a case.

>>9351521

@Jack's opeartion on Twitter consists of:

1) identifying the "threat" (any user who is vocal about the truth)

2) shadowbanning that person (the person is never warned that they're doing anything "wrong" by sharing the truth, and the person is never de-platformed - the person is simply, quietly made invisible so that he's essentially tweeting into the wind, never knowing that NO ONE sees his tweets)

3) @Jack then further reinforces the deception, to keep the user from knowing their completely silenced (but NOT de-platformed per se) by allowing SOME very select Twitter accounts to see the user's tweets, and to follow that user. This gives the ILLUSION that you are reaching the outside world, but you are NOT.

4) These select Twitter accounts who can see the user act in concert, knowing that their agenda is to keep you tricked and silenced. They cajole, manipulate and intimidate the user, all while pretending to be a "friend." You wonder why you don't attract the followers that other accounts seem to attract, even though those other accounts don't put half the work into their research, memes or original content. Meanwhile, ALL your followers are fake. Every last one of them.

That is manipulation of political process on US soil by a US company. And it goes further than political manipulation. That is breaking multiple laws. Fraud for one. Threat of bodily harm is another. The list goes on. Again, once people find out, the class action lawsuit will destroy Twitter over night.

>>9351706

The whole "de-platforming" game is a charade. The fact is the "troublesome" Twitter user is NOT de-platformed. Only fake accounts are de-platformed to create a theatre of intimidation for the ordinary user. The ordinary user is not de-platformed because he is tricked and doesn't need to be de-platformed. He believes he is still on Twitter and reaching other "anons" (friends and followers) who are all actually fake. That way Twitter can track the thoughts and opinions of the people all while controlling and cajoling the users. Why de-platform such useful users? They want to track the great awakening and keep it CONTAINED. They USE the Twitter user to collect this data and try to control the narrative.

@Jack has ultimately failed.

He is warned.