>>9356593 pb
Heads up for fuckery in the future from AOCs district in Queens.
Those 2, and the other 2, are Soros funded.
>>9356593 pb
Heads up for fuckery in the future from AOCs district in Queens.
Those 2, and the other 2, are Soros funded.
the market for car parts is not dominated by 1 major company. There are a lot of different car parts stores. Maybe that fact pisses somebody off?
I haven't seen too many people talking about the Executive Order today.
I'm reading 2 things out of that EO.
1) Some things are going to happen in the future. The FCC is involved, the FTC is involved, the Attorney General is involved There will be new rules. But the EO didn't announce specifically what those new rules are. Processes to get new rules were outlined.
2) One thing did change, and I could be mistaken, but I think the change takes place now. All the big social media companies have been declared PUBLISHERS if they delete Conservative stuff. Which, to most people, doesn't mean anything. But it's actually quite important.
It means that if you've been DEFAMED, using Twitter or Facebook or Youtube, you can NOW SUE TWITTER, FACEBOOK OR YOUTUBE.
Before, the social media companies said "we're like telephone lines. People can say anything they want, we don't care, we're free speech, impartial." But now, they're editing out what they don't like. They used to have no, or limited editing. But now they're editing out conservative opinions. They have taken on the role of EDITOR. They didn't before. Now they do. And if Twitter, Facebook and Youtube have the time and the manpower to get rid of conservative thought, they also have the time and the manpower to get rid of defamation.
People have been suing other people, or businesses have been suing people over defamation. The defamers have been using facebook twitter and youtube to defame. But Twitter and Facebook and Youtube haven't been sued for defamation. Just the defamer.
Now, if you've been defamed, you sue the defamer and you sue the site that the defamer used to defame you.
Because if they're in the deleting business (and they weren't before, now they are)
if they don't delete a defamatory comment, it means that they agree with it.
What that means to Q Anons?
2 Anons who know each other IRL go onto Facebook.
Anon 1 "You rape and eat babies"
Anon 2 "That's defamation, you rape and eat babies"
Anon 1 "That's defamation, I"m going to sue you, and now that Facebook is now deemed a publisher, I'm going to sue that ridiculously deep pockets defendant."
Anon 2 "Right back at you, suing you and Facebook. We'll both make fucktons of money from Facebook."