>>9360596 lb
the guy is most definately a provocateur. but he's wearing a mask, making it impossible to see most of his face and the DMs by his supposed ex fiance are fake imo. so its likely hes not the local cop that was ID'd. its a red herring
>>9360596 lb
the guy is most definately a provocateur. but he's wearing a mask, making it impossible to see most of his face and the DMs by his supposed ex fiance are fake imo. so its likely hes not the local cop that was ID'd. its a red herring
when the riots start in my city, ill be crakin the skulls of any looter/vandal with an aluminum baseball bat.
kek im already on lists. so are you anon.
not the same imo. the eyebrows and cheekbone are different
so they look different but its the same person cause their emotional state isnt the same?
what happened to anons?
we were flooded with mountains of disinfo last night and everyone just ran with it. not one ounce of logic.
really? cause im using logic and discernment. all you got is weak as name calling because you are afraid of the truth and unwilling to admit you're being fooled by a DS op to further incite hate towards cops during a race riot.
"the arrest was fake, the cop is cia, the guy isnt even dead bla bla bla"
but when twitter identifies a provocateur as a local PD thats immediately 100% valid.
the fact that the 3 replies to my post are nothing but name calling and claiming im a shill confirms to me that you are not anons. you are here pushing an unverified narrative. anons know better
not because you offered a counter argument. because you offered a counter argument that made no sense
do you know how easy it is to fake DMs? how quickly anons forget muh chatlogs. the info bar on the mobile device isnt even the same in the two pics but anons refuse to believe that anything about this situation is false. just keep falling for the DS adding fuel to the fire.
go on and refute my evidence that the chats are fake. ill wait. you have nothing but insults and conjecture. no body is buying what you're selling faggot.