Anonymous ID: 9fcc4d May 29, 2020, 8:39 a.m. No.9361519   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1548 >>1586

>>9361459

Wasnt there a fight about "lolli" here recently?

Anything that would go against the new definitions.

 

Check this out, even Amazon is trying to protect itself with 230.

 

"Even Amazon is trying to use Section 230 to protect itself. After a Wall Street Journal report exposed the site for allowing vendors to sell "banned, unsafe and mislabeled products," the mega-retailer is arguing that it's an online forum, and that Section 230 protects it from any liability from what third parties sell on its marketplaces. This is arguably a severe twist of the definition of a "forum."'

 

>https://www.tomsguide.com/news/what-is-section-230-why-it-matters-to-you