This is gonna get interesting. Just catalog which bakers are pulling this shit.
Anons should go to /comms/ and read the breads but do it on /tor/ because the board owner of can see your info if you post. Discussing deleting notables and refusing to not hand off to anyone but each other.
It's why they use "guud" to identify each other.
>they do that to my mouse when they don't get their war
Baker, are you implying other anons hacked your PC and messed with your mouse? Is that really the direction you are going with this?
>https://twitter.com/ODNIgov/status/1266461778126540800
>Q, i know you're busy saving the world and all, but can you confirm that the enemy is attempting to invade this board,
They're not attempting, they already have. They took control months ago, but no one paid attention.
>it took Q months to correct the new BO's behavior and it's taking them a full year SO FAR to say something about the baker issue.
This should be obvious, bakers are not the owners of the breads, anons and Q are. Bakers should have 0 say in who takes a hand off when they ask for one. This bullshit about go to /comms/ and you're not verified is no different than when the same bakers union people did it before.
Since when does Doc get to decide whom he hands off to? That isn't how this shit works.
Infiltration not invasion
Get pastebins.
Isn't Magaveli the one that added warroom links to the dough a few weeks back?
>this doesn't seem like Doc.
sauce
honestly, who gives a fuck anymore. Let the bakers be shills, let them think they are in control. It really makes no difference until anons wise the fuck up and stop allowing it or enough people go so vocal Q has to step in and shut this shit down. They delete notables, we just repost them over and over.
agree, but they create false agreements because they work together to control the bakes. Until enough anons pay attention and become vocal there is nothing that will change unless BO/Q step in.