>>9370516 lb

I didn't read it that way. Not to say you're wrong, you're not wrong much. Maybe I'm naive but I just read it at face value:

My take:

>KISLYAK: And I just wanted to tell you that we found that these actions

Obama's expulsion of Russian diplomats

>have targeted not only against Russia, but also against the president elect.

That Obama did this with the intention of harming president elect DJT, perhaps by hamstringing his brand-new administration with a diplomatic crisis

>FLYNN: Yeah, yeah

>KISLYAK: and and with all our rights to responds

With our right of response,

>to have decided not to act now

Russia has decided NOT to retaliate against the expulsions right now

>because, its because people

people = the Obama admin

>are dissatisfied with the lost of elections

It's true, Obama & cohorts WERE very "dissatisfied" with Hillary's election loss

>and, and its very deplorable.

Kislyak expressing regret, reprobation of Obama's actions

>So, so I just wanted to let you know that our conversation was taken with weight.

We (Russia) took Kislyak's conversation with Flynn very seriously

There is a big problem with the story we have been given about MN

>When the ambulance arrives, rather than tend the victim, which the official reports states the ambulance was warned he needed medical attention and was unresponsive, they did not tend to him immediately on the ground, instead they loaded him onto the gurney without checking a damn thing, pushed him into the ambulance and drove off. There's a HUGE problem with that.

>Standard EMT procedure in this case is FIRST to take his pulse and administer CPR if needed RIGHT WHERE HE IS FOUND LAYING. EMT's do not load people onto the stretcher first, they first get the person stable if possible and then load them. No one at any point, no officer and no EMT ever checked the guy's pulse. That there alone proves it was a crisis act, done by people who were not professionals knowledgeable enough to even fake it good.

EMTs arriving on scene are legally bound to start resuscitation

https://iaedjournal.org/protocol-9-cardiac-or-respiratory-arrest-death/

Why didn't that happen?

The Journal of Emergency Dispatch

Article

Pic related

Must evaluate patient's condition,check for vital signs, attempt resuscitation.

Unless the victim is OBVIOUSLY dead such as cold, decapitated, etc.

Or unless there's a legal Do Not Resuscitate order with the body.

And that was NOT the case with this alleged victim.

Think. Something's not right about this story.

>>9370871

There are other problems.

Isn't it REALLY STRANGE that the cop and the victim purportedly knew each other?

I mean, we read that they both worked at the same place FOR SEVENTEEN YEARS.

(Seventeen – but I digress)

They HAD to have known each other even if they worked different shifts.

17 years is longer than many people have been married.

What is the chance that a cop arrests a guy that worked at the same place for 17 years, because that guy allegedly passed a counterfeit $20?

When there are lots of individual alleged pieces of evidence, you just don't look at them individually. In intelligence work you look at the compound probability of the chance of THIS times the chance of THIS times the chance of THIS…

and pretty soon the probability of ALL those odd things happening simultaneously becomes 1 in a million or 1 in a billion or something…

That's when obscure evidence becomes STRONK evidence that something is FISHY.

>>9370973

Venezuela trying to get its sovereign gold back from UK where the gold was on deposit.

Physical gold is rarely transported.

Instead, promises to deliver fly around.

Spouse just read today of a court case in the UK that will decide whether Maduro of Venezuela controls Venezuela's gold, or whether Guido of Venezuela controls it.

This is HUGE.

That the legitmate ruler of Venezuela will be decided by proxy by a court case in the UK?

It's past my bedtime. Can't sauce RN.

Try Zero Hedge

>>9371013

re: that crime scene lat/long

Last evening somebody posted this.

I capped it then disregarded further.

WTF?

>>9371108

I stand corrected.

Thank you anon.

HOWEVER my points about compound probabilities of a series of improbable "coincidences" stand. There are many of them in this story.

>>9371232

Unknown referent does not compute