you got some good fish there, all Bass?
but here is the thing: those organizations would be known as 'garbage fish'
they are not edible.
wasn't there that secret executive order that put contact tracing and RFID chips in all bricks, something about 'smart buildings' . . .
see. . . .how easy it is to give out disinformation.
careful what you touch, it's all being traced.
Bricks usually do have very distinct marking, and that's a tradition that goes back 2000 years where masons made the world awesome with concrete and bricks.
like they can't do a chain of ownership on bricks.
I hope the ones providing the bricks spend a long time in jail
like all brick purchases can't be easily traced.
or did they get it from a demolished construction site?
the law of backatche is pretty severe in the heathen realms. Those who support that kind of behavior have a world of hurt coming there way.
the name seems fake.
It's Lowell George
and Pink Floyd
mashed together, so it's got a clown-name quality.
It's not far fetched to imagine that contact tracing bricks is possible.
not far fetched at all.
wouldn't that be a sweet little fiction if it comes to life.
here is the form of idiot shill insighters post, observational anti shill tutorial if you will:
stupd statement of weasel word denial, meager bridge clause between parenthesis, slander against service people, police, and orgnaized active government sponsered necessary peace keepers.
I was thinking more like snapshots of the id tags of the embedded rfid secret inner part of the brick that identifies the brick uniquely and is activated by a 'pulse' from some system and then gives a reveal of it's number and it's location for use in a 3D mapping virtual world.
it would be a low bandwidth thing, and perhaps never used.
but it wouldn't be a hard thing to engineer: smart bricks for smart architecture, but very stupid for stupid aggitprop clown-show vermin.
picture the brick being able to tell you were it is with a pulse from an app . . . do that every so often and store the data.
ah, you seem upset at my dead-on breakdown of the form of your post.
maybe you do have room for growth.
I solve problems by bringing awareness.
a breakdown of other peoples assumptions within their narratives allows us to ask 'do these assumptions seem fair.'
in the case of the type of the post I commented on, there was obvious slander against people who have a certain type of career.
So I pointed out your slander and you felt shame. That's good anon. That is what I'm doing.
trying to help you love the police and troopers and service people. Cause you're missing out on some good people . . .
you're not he.
don't use other anon's catch phrase!
if you are he, sorry, the image seems incongruent to the guy I know and admire.
I am condescending to people who disrespect the awesome men and women who take a service career. That is true.
the rest of what you say I have to read it so I will and maybe get back to you.
my discussion is a break down of the assumptions in a post, anon. you often say things that have assumptions (people often say things) that they don't realize that 'oh, see what this makes me look like'.
in your case a closed minded bigot who dislikes police.
So when I point this out to you in a cold and clinical way you think it's me whose being cold.
but in fact it's kind of a prayer for the people who I like: those who take service careers.
and those who I think about as I write this. That makes me feel warm and happy, thinking how lucky we are to have them and how much good they do (most are good).
and my dead-on tagging your assumptions as bigoted bothers you, anon, because you don't want to be a bigot.
seeing these men and women as 'necessary evil' isn't giving me an sense that you comprehend them as individuals and people the same as you are.