>>938139

archived offline.

>>938179

Wow…these guys REALLY want to control the narrative.

Too bad. Sucks to be cabal.

>>938439

>All 4 a LARP?

KEK

>>938369

Watching this. Anons….thoughts?

>>938673

agreed. That's the intro. More interested in thoughts of the next part - the guy saying 'it is over'.

>>938719

Ok. My curiosity is why he'd be saying 'we won - it is over'. Seems very strange. I can't get my head around a strategy on either side for this. Perhaps I'm missing something. (Maybe he's just retarded.)

>>938749

there it is. Beanz appears to be someone we can stand with. Thoughts?

>>938804

>go to reddit is a thought

indeed. but so is fapping to a picture of a turd.

>>938849

this could be disinformation that was necessary.

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxVzaXMj76U

Seaman is saying he's seen an unsealed indictment and that 'it is over'.

Anyone want to comment on this? Q - some of us are JUST A LITTLE skeptical about everything here.

>>938945

Yeah, this smells like a brand new slide tactic. I'm not making assumptions.

>>938994

possibly. however, everything else he's saying is in-line with Q, except 'it is over - we won'. thus, my drawing attention to it.

>>939017

I agree. I have never derived an opinion about Beanz being black/white-hat. It appears she's white.

>>939074

this alone doesn't convince me. we all know what a fog of war is (or at least the more intellgent ones do.) I'm just trying to get more of a sense of the veracity of the current info flying around.