I understand an anon called this in around midnight last night, and I hope it turns out well (pic related).

When I read Q's post I interpreted his message as a cautionary tale. Take the Vegas story. The sheriff was pained trying to be honest but it became apparent he had his fibber Special Agent handler (forget his name), standing over his shoulder 'instructing' him what not to answer. Over time, they shut down the press briefings entirely.

What I am worried about is if Q meant this.

'If you report (what we white hats already have evidence of), watch what will happen to you. You will become the focus (spotlight), and they will use some crime they pin on you as a diversion to stear the story from child trafficking (subject deviation).

Obviously, there is a real [risk] to anyone, trying to do the right thing, who gets involved. Don't pursue this course to solicit help from the authorities [END].'

Just my take…again, hope I'm wrong but thought I would share my thoughts. As we know, the meaning behind Q's posts are not always as straight-forward as we think.