>>9407857 (pb)
It was funny. kek
If you don't get it, don't assume it's negative.
NO. Maybe ex-military, but even then…..
We'd have the same problem as most being lawyers now, just different.
I'm all for military governors during a crisis though. Heaven knows my state could use one right about now.
Well, The US Field Manual (1976) states:
Members of the armed forces of a party to the conflict and members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces lose their right to be treated as prisoners of war whenever they deliberately conceal their status in order to pass behind the military lines of the enemy for the purpose of gathering military information or for the purpose of waging war by destruction of life or property. Putting on civilian clothes or the uniform of the enemy are examples of concealment of the status of a member of the armed forces.
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule62
Sounds to me like we are about there. "Losing the right to be treated as prisoners of war" can be terminal.
"OR"?
Yes. Since at least a couple hours ago.
Barr called out Marshalls and DEA.
POTUS designated Sec of Army military governor of DC (which may or may not replace civilian government, unclear), who called out full DC Nat Guard.
Think that's we know so far. DC blackout.