>There's no punctuation error, and it's not the WHO that is financing the riots.
So you are saying it's a statement and not a question, right?
>There's no punctuation error, and it's not the WHO that is financing the riots.
So you are saying it's a statement and not a question, right?
If that is Paris, why does it say police in Ingrish?
>"Who's paying for these people."
Irrespective of whether we know who's funding it or not, that is still a question, even if rhetorical and thus is lacking an interrogatory punctuation mark.
Saddick khan't is a filthy wolf in sheep's clothing.