>>9412248 pb
Yes, but the Democrats are enabling this attempt which certainly will fail miserably.
So when voting time comes around, people will choose between the party that likes rioting and arson and doesn't like churches and kills old people and the party that takes the opposite position.
trump wins 70/30 at this point. If it ever gets close to bad, Soros is dead, and a whole bunch of other Jew Communist types are dead and the vaccine pushers like Gates are dead. This is not a hard one at all. Trump has been extremely chill to this point, but the US Military has a fuckton of killing power. And it might be unconsititutional for him to exercise that power, but the new Supreme Court that replaced the Supreme Court that he killed would say what he did was ok. And it wouldn't come close, at all, to coming to that. For the Jew Communist Democrat coalition to have any success, everything would have to go right for them, and Trump would have to refrain from doing anything on a long, long list of things he could do.
When we're talking about an election, Trump should play it somewhat cool, avoiding the appearance of unconstitutional overreach, but it we're actually talking about something different than that, Trump can do pretty much anything. The US Military is much more powerful than Russia in 1917, it would be ridiculously easy to put this down. People are not willing to die for Soros and the Jew Communists. The Democrats are holding a terrible hand, and their actions are just making it worse. Every new bullshit crisis takes 5 points from the Democrats and gives 5 points to the GOP.
I haven't seen the polls. It will be very hard to find 30% right now who would like both a) letting rioters riot and b) closing churches for safety. Most people understand that rioting is not safe. Most people understand that churches are much more safe than riots, and the Democrats are taking the "riots are more safe than churches" approach which will not work for more than 30%.