>>9413930 (pb in regards to the pallets of bricks being owned by the city)

This just raises more questions.

1) What city project are they being used for in that area? Nothing apparent from photos.

2)If there is a city project in the area, why are they left on the side of the street?

3) If no city project in the area, why did the city drop them off on a random sidewalk and just leave them there?

4) If this was done on purpose, it means the CITY is using your tax dollars to fund the rioters. Think about that. The people in this city are inadvertently paying for their own destruction.

5) Who said it was the cities? Where is the paperwork? Follow the money.

6) Who signed off on not only buying this, but who signed off / gave the order to have these dropped off at that location?

We already know from other cities that propositioned supplies are being used to assist in the destruction, so there is already a predicate a reason to investigate if this was done purposefully.

>>9414039

Not a lawfag, but guessing that he will release his required response to the mandumus after the riots get hot tonight so as to try and hide it.

>>9414145

appreciate it, but it doesn’t negate the questions.

1) Who ordered the construction from the HOA?

2) Even though construction hadn’t started, they just leave the bricks on the side of the road like that? Is that normal?

3) Lets see the paperwork, if it can be shown (paperwork for work filed before protests) Id be more willing to let it slide.

4) Who specifically said, who specifically ordered the bricks to be left in that location?