Anonymous ID: 868390 June 1, 2020, 2:05 p.m. No.9417269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7352

I need help with a libtard on item 1,2,3

 

1- is i fully expected a contraction autoposy due to propaganda being legal.

2-??Idont knwo what to say about that.

 

  1. The second autopsy showed homicide. 2. The soon to be ex-wife releases a statement through her attorney 3. How can you prove a crime was committed by Mr. Floyd when he did not receive due process, remember innocent until proven guilty?? That applies for black people too! lol I hear people giving the cop the benefit of the doubt but for some reason not the dead black man laying in the street.

Anonymous ID: 868390 June 1, 2020, 2:11 p.m. No.9417352   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9417269

my reply. Anythign I should add?

 

I am I am absolutely not surprised at that. I was expecting it actually, they got it out faster than I thought too. We've seen the same pattern of opposite news in the media for three years. Recent examples is the Flynn case and Covid-19 with wildly opposing versions of truth or facts in the news. Why does that happen? (read the links on propaganda being legal) Who is doing the lying and what version is the truth? Do you know which one is true? Is it the first one or the second one real? Are they both false? You can't say with 100% certainty can you. Because we dont have a media that tells the truth. Did you not read my two links on legal propaganda? Please read those before asking me more questions. If we have legal propaganda, which autopsy is the the truth when media can report lies without any punishment and there are many key instances that are proven where the media lies.

 

2) Until anything is released it's hearsay. I can say I'm her lawyer and that's true. Prove me wrong. Look what I said on the wife that you disregarded and only focused on the filing, which still isn't on record (yet). Nice diversion point .

 

3) Use logic- no crime is fully investigated before the cop arrests. That's not how law enforcement works. Usually a phone call is made that a crime was/is committed or the victim files a report. Read up stream to understand the timeline of events. I cannot even believe you asked that question. The innocent until proven guilty relates to the trial process. Based on your understanding no one would ever be arrested because they haven't been tried for the crime yet. Your same logic applies to the cop, you you have already cast as guilty without due process or all the facts