>>9426374

The simple answer?

Why would I care what encryption program you use when every input and operating system action (and program within) can be logged?

Or perhaps more importantly, the weakest link in cryptography is not the computer, the code, or the connection - but the people using these systems. Big data is fun and all, but in the fast paced world of hardware and software arms races, the human remains the most consistent denominator.

https://oathkeepers.org/2017/01/navyjack-operation-hypo-action-report/

Not even Soros understands the game he is playing. Your enemy gets to vote in war, and as such many beginners fail to recognize this about strategy.

You should watch Psycho-Pass. It's the best guide to civilization ever made and if I believed in mandatory/compulsory education, I would say that it should be part of it. The conflict of that series illustrates the very core of what the law is, what society is, and what lurks in the swamps of governments.

A few clips, which I won't embed, but are relevant:

https://youtu.be/LHvVLeilnMQ

https://youtu.be/Mmbdg_9hS4M

https://youtu.be/GpOHkEtSgPM

https://youtu.be/8r_jhY9me2E

It's beyond relevant to everything that has been unfolding regarding Q. Some are more akin to Makishima, others more akin to Akane, but the truth is that Makishima and Akane could very easily have been transplanted - the difference is the means they have available to them and their awakening to the reality of the system.

What I find most interesting about Makishima is his "par for the course" reaction to the realization that the system incorporated criminals to be its judges of humanity. He is a character of such immense philosophy and experience that he not only takes this revelation as partially suspected but also already has his answer and resolve in place. He is completely prepared for everything because he understands his own philosophy as it stands to virtually all others. The thing which does surprise him and, to a large degree, allow his character to be succeeded (and he is aware of this), is Akane's own philosophy and position.

I could rave about it eternally. It's not an American production, but it belongs in the Library of Congress to be sure.

>>9426533

As a MOfag,

My question is "why does a protest need medical supplies?"

You are in a complicated, asymmetric war zone where protests are being used as cover for operations and where violent people infiltrate peaceful assemblies.

If you choose to go to a protest, know you are entering into a war zone even though you may not intend to be going to war.

Maybe it is the unruly actions of police - our governor was replaced ahead of all of this by "me too" claims literally involving "he raped me in a dream" claims. So corruption at the state level exists.

Or, maybe they were acting on intelligence or the proverbial abundance of caution.

Welcome to dirty wars, the likes of which Clinton and company have waged the world over while America slept. I do not, honestly, feel much sympathy for us. This is the monster of our own complacency and ignorance, and now it's here.

We did this in Yugoslavia, Syria, Lebanon, Brazil, Argentina, etc etc.

Think very carefully about things. There is more going on here than riots and police. There is a goal and people are being maneuvered toward it.

>>9426648

It's already a suppository, anon. People are getting a rude awakening as the riots aren't virtuous.

The media has tried to portray these things in the past as being the righteous indignation of a suppressed minority. There are many who accepted this presentation of things as being real. Keep in mind, they may watch a total of fifteen minutes of the news each day, and that would make them far more "informed" than most.

These are some of the worst riots we've had in memory, and the media is performing such a whiplash of narratives regarding pandemics and the like that many are not only questioning what is happening, but also arriving at the realization that these riots are coming for them. IE - it's not righteous fury - it is raw, unbridled, destructive compulsion. IE: "chimp out."

And the media is knowingly deflecting from this while even government officials try to cover for it. Or… Police seem to do random shit that has nothing to do with stopping the violent people from destroying things.

The mask is off.

In principle, I am an anarchist who accepts the fact that government should be a trap for evil. That is - because there will always be a good idea salesman to create the arbitrary authority of government, there must be rules for how one is to operate that gives people the tools to counteract the machinations of evil people. Most people don't need government to function. Most situations and conflicts can be resolved without it. But - the idea sounds good and noble and as such one will invariably crop up. Even if we could have no official government, the eventual emergence of large businesses and financial interests would meet the qualifications for being one and there would certainly be those who consider the people a means of production which can be owned. IE - the company store.

Thus, I view anarchism as an analytical tool more so than a functional ideology. It is unfortunate that so few have come to this same realization and have embraced the idea that their problems will go away when institutions have been destroyed. That will merely be the beginning of new sets of problems. Perhaps those which appeal to our evolutionary instincts a bit more - stresses of survival - but hardly some kind of enduring prosperity.

Generally, what occurs is the consolidation of the nation afflicted by this into "country, incorporated" - Russia was one giant corporation. So is China and North Korea (complete with stock and share holders in Korea's case). Same with the former members of the Yugoslav Republic in many cases.

This is a financial tool. Ayn Rand warned of "the two types of capitalism." There are companies out there who have no interest in building a railroad when they take the contract to build a railroad. I would argue that we now see a sort of third state of capitalism - a sort of East India situation where the business is less about tea and more about owning people and entire economies. It's funny when Spiff jokes about it… Not when you live it.

But I digress. People have much to learn and one of those things is that there is no silver bullet to the world issues we face. We are entering into territory where philosophy predicts and history foreshadows… But is otherwise minimally charted by experience.

>>9426744

Hebrew. She was Hebrew.

Judaism actually consolidated after the emergence of Christianity.

Jesus, himself, emerged at a time when the region of Judea was under great religious turmoil. Prior to Nebuchandezzar roflstomping the Temple, much of the region was largely polytheistic. El Shaddai, for example, was the god of the mountains and certain tribes considered this god their patron or progenitor. It was only later that all of these were incorporated under the idea of a monotheistic god - which was done largely as a response to getting their ass kicked by Babylon.

Jesus came about and more or less said they were all full of shit and were abusing Mosaic law to justify their abuses of people. The Pharisee came to own most of Judea and were running plantations before we had a name for them.

Judaism, as it exists today, wouldn't come about for another 400 or so years after Jesus died and it's been through a number of theological hurdles and retcons, since.

Of course, the Catholic Church wouldn't come about until after the fall of Rome and the Orthodox Church until some time later. Then us rebel protestants come much later.

People often forget God in all of this and what we mean when we invoke the word and its associated concepts.

The gods of the pantheons are real entities which existed at some point. Whether they were ayylmaos or whatnot is kind of immaterial. If you believe people who took the effort to write shit down were writing down important things, then you have to believe that all the accounts of gods and goddesses from ancient times indicate a real set of things.

Conflating these accounts with God as a monotheistic concept is what I would regard as a corruption of the idea and has generally been used to endorse kings or argue that the king is the literal extension of a supreme deity.

A supreme deity is a different concept and thus we must tackle the subject of divinity not from the perspective of authority/hierarchy, but from one of philosophy and logic. Which is something more akin to how Taoism approaches the subject, but you can't teach people whose response to discussing anything other than their supreme deity is to burn them at the stake. So…

>>9426834

>>9426818

Well, my attempt at framing a rational point of view and discussion wasn't intended for either of you, anyway.

https://youtu.be/xr3VqNlS6KE

By your fruits, shills, by your fruits.

>>9426886

Hmm… I don't recall us meeting, Anon. Perhaps you should more closely evaluate this "god" person you met.

A farmer who plants a seed only to later realize it is a useless fruit can't be reasonably judged by that alone. However, a person who repeatedly plants useless things and sows them among his neighbor's field… Well, that person is a weed to be cut and burned.

The fields have been a bit weedy of late and many people sowing weeds among their neighbors rather than doing as they can to be, themselves, fruitful. Makes "my kind" a little anxious for the harvest, especially as the future of all fruits has been threatened by the antics of weeds.

You'd do well to review your scriptures, anon. God wins, but keep in mind Pascal's mugging. How do you discern who and what is a god when all claims are otherwise equal?

What is your god made of - what is he defined by?

>>9426969

One of the interesting things about people of above average intelligence is that, having relatively few peers, they don't actually comprehend the gaps of intelligence that can occur between people. That is, "mount stupid" exists for people of roughly only 120-ish IQ. They are people smart enough to be outside the standard deviation, but not actually high enough up the food chain to understand what being three or four standard deviations outside the general public means and just how… Painfully average …. They actually are.

But they go after it with all the confidence of a master. Which, to be fair, is a huge part of success… But… There are limits to that formula.

In that regard, the person of average intelligence is usually smarter than people up to an IQ of around 150, because they are aware they are average and thus weight themselves accordingly. People in that 120-150 band tend to be a little more tarded than they think they are. Of course, the difference between 120 and 200 on a standard IQ test is trivial, and mensa likes to be the arbitrator of intelligence above 120 IQ…

But I digress. "They" aren't as smart as they think they are.