dChan
Anonymous ID: e82280 June 2, 2020, 4:03 a.m. No.9427175   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7194 >>7226 >>7282 >>7332 >>7538

Most indoor images of the President should be at eye level or for very important events, below eye level.

 

If the President is seated and others around him are standing, eye level is the midpoint between the faces of the President those standing.

 

It’s not 4 feet above everyone’s goddamn head.

 

He hired 7’5” Chewbacca who was down on his luck as his photographer so this presents challenges and this is evident.

 

He also bailed out Ed McMahon when the bank was foreclosing of his Hollywood estate late in life after he got sick.

 

Inherently generous man.

 

Somebody buy Chewy a book on cinematography.

 

Roll up a newspaper and thump him in the snout.

 

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/tips-and-solutions/filmmaking-101-camera-shot-types

Anonymous ID: e82280 June 2, 2020, 4:10 a.m. No.9427226   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9427175

 

Images are important. The President doesn’t have time to do everything himself.

 

Blain Brown

 

Cinematography: Theory and Practice, Second Edition: Image Making for Cinematographers and Directors (Volume 1)

 

2nd Edition

 

ISBN-13: 978-0240812090,

ISBN-10: 0240812093

 

amazon. com/Cinematography-Theory-Practice-Cinematographers-Directors/dp/0240812093

Anonymous ID: e82280 June 2, 2020, 4:20 a.m. No.9427282   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9427175

 

What’s pretty disappointing about the White House camera angle crisis is that the President has two known experts in cinematography working directly for him.

 

Steve “Skinny Gru” Mnuchin

Big Time Hollywood Producer/Treasury Secretary/de facto Fed Chairman

 

Jared Kushner

Has Read 25 Books on Stuff

 

Also, Trump’s campaign typically has epic visuals. The White House has less control obviously, but runs a 90% failure rate on images released, in particular those in the Oval Office.

Anonymous ID: e82280 June 2, 2020, 4:32 a.m. No.9427332   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7344 >>7372 >>7448 >>7513

>>9427175

 

This photo is epic.

 

And it would have been even a magnitude better had it been shot from a foot or more lower.

 

That simple change would have left any viewer with a much stronger sense of Presidential authority, power and mite.

Anonymous ID: e82280 June 2, 2020, 5:04 a.m. No.9427501   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7587 >>7600 >>7629

Would be nice if General Flynn were cleared today by the Circuit Court, quickly repudiating the corruption in the District Court.

 

Quick turnaround would make a statement that a slow response would not.

Anonymous ID: e82280 June 2, 2020, 5:11 a.m. No.9427546   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9427415

 

It will be in every history book

 

and it would have been ever better closer to eye level with the president

 

The black and white symbolism has a breathtakingly good effect

Anonymous ID: e82280 June 2, 2020, 5:19 a.m. No.9427594   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7734

>>9427538

 

Well ackchually, That cool guy is just pointing out that the President’s photographer doesn’t know how to do his job.

 

This falls on Scavino.

 

If you compare ALL photos and videos of prior presidents against the bulk of those currently coming out of the White House, one could see that they guy they hired doesn’t know his craft.

 

The current style over all photos being 4 feet above the president’s head make him look weak and vulnerable. Over time they have a contributing effect in marginal supporters of delegitimizing the office.

 

You are an idiot.

 

Wanting to make the president look better with neutral eye level shots or at time slight upward angles is not making him look like a dictator.

 

They hired an AV Club techie who apparently knows nothing about cinematography and is three feet too tall to ever do his job well.

 

Everything you said is the opposite of what is true.

 

You’re trying to make the president continue to look less goodly than he could.

 

kys and tape it for me