The female judge keeps interrupting, not allowing the completion of a thought, in order to ask a totally different question, and then keeps saying "I'm not following" - it seems quite intentional. In addition, the judges are arguing against JW, not arguing against Clinton/Mills attorney, but acting on behalf of Clinton/Mills. She is coming across as petty, emotional and partial, as well as slightly desperate to shield Clinton/Mills from being deposed by ignoring the main root of the issue - SAP/CLASSIFIED information on Clinton's private email server that foreign actors had access to…
I've never listened to such a hearing before, but honestly, I expected the judges to be far more professional than this.