Amzing how anytime anyone calls out a baker for anything.. right or wrong.. 5-10 other "bakers" pile on to back up said baker.
Almost like a team or a union or something. Weird. Kinda like the other day when the baker refused to handofff to someone he deemed "unverified"
No worries though, I'm sure everything isGUUD
>Amzing how anytime anyone calls out a baker for anything.. right or wrong.. 5-10 other "bakers" pile on to back up said baker.
>
>Almost like a team or a union or something. Weird. Kinda like the other day when the baker refused to handofff to someone he deemed "unverified"
>
>No worries though, I'm sure everything isGUUD
Next they'll be pushing for Tripcodes and screaming they need to replace the BO.
It's like all of this has happened before.
>Amazing how when others back up a baker some fucking nigger things its only other bakers.
Amazing that you believe anons don't know you are.
>Same way plebbit shills signal for narrative changes
The same way bakers use GUUD to verify to each other that they are part of the same team so they can control the bake and the flow of information.
>I am sure I will bake again, but been leaving it to the more experienced bakers for now.
No you won't unless you attend the class on /comms/ and the bakers union say you're allowed to bake. New rules they just made up.
o7
>I'm not a baker, but this attack on baker for not doing what one person wanted is ridiculous. What you're not getting/acknowledging is that ANONS SUPPORT BAKERS, not whiny bitches who threaten to and do, hijack the dough.
>
>All of you please just fuck back off to endchan.
I didn't attack the bakers, I pointed out how the bakers attack anyone that disagrees with the bakers, and then IP hop to form a consensus.
>Yes, it follows the same way they have cracked every controlled platform on the net.
>
>Claim bakers (mods) are comped
>
>Get their own people in
>
>Force the other organic bakers (mods) out
>
>Control the content and conversation.
Excellent breakdown of exactly what the current bakers union did, don't forget the astroturfed TYB and rainman persona which was devised to make the anons rally behind them.
>Everyone knows 'copy/paste' dog won't hunt. Baker has to be familiar with 751 posts in a very short period, refine the posts and get the next bake going while collecting all the past archival and notes.
Ok, let me rephrase, read/copy/paste.
Moran.
>When I hear a reasoned rebuttal I'll reply to it.
When you make a post worth making a reasoned rebuttal I'll make one. You're trying to sell a research board on the fact that baking is hard. You must be a 75 IQ waterhead to believe that.
>Baking is easy for the ones that are good at it. It's faster than a 10 red bull breakfast is what I'm saying.
Baking is easy for anyone. The average post is ~7 words. How long does it take for you to disseminate information from 7 words?
>The Baker is the only 'OPS' position on this board
The Baker is an anon who copies/paste. The current bakers are agents here to censor information covertly, build followings on twitter, and eventually take full control over the board. All it takes is 20 minutes on qresear.ch to verify all of this.
>baker here,
Baker Here. Baking is always easy and anyone saying it isn't is only trying to convince anons that haven't baked not to.
>The most important task is an EDITORIAL TASK of selecting/identifying/culling the most noteworthy information, and either SELECTING or WRITING clear, concise HEADLINES to make that information CONSUMABLE both to anons and OUTSIDE OF QR.
Censoring notables is exactly what they would believe is important, agreed.