Anonymous ID: 000000 June 2, 2020, 11:22 a.m. No.9431521   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1540 >>1628 >>1652 >>1779 >>1808 >>1834 >>1985

This is simply Kabuki theater

The rulers do not consider themselves democrats or republicans

When they look in the mirror they see a ruler, period

Conservatism and liberalism can coexist perfectly fine, they each have areas where they are appropriate, what works for Manhattan will not be appropriate for Utah

Democrats and republicans are a dumbed-down, neutered version of those political philosophies designed to set you against one another

The plan for the new world order proceeds as it always has, you are now cheering martial law and the surveillance state and consider yourselves enlightened for this

None of this is by chance, the two camps and the kayfabe between them, are used to usher in laws and norms which none of you would have supported otherwise

The rulers are friends with each other, they are not friends with you and never will be

Stop falling for this stupidity. Your salvation will never come from a democrat or a republican, it will never come from the voting booth

A populist uprising is the only way, and this would only work if the military joined with the people against the rulers

You may think that "behind every blade of grass" will be able to put up a fight but you have absolutely no conception the lengths the military is prepared to go, they must be on our side for things to ever change

Q is not this, though he says otherwise, Q is more of the same, as you can see by simply looking out your window

If you keep demonizing the other side, if you keep waiting for a savior, nothing will ever get better and we will all wake up in a Brave New World

A world of total surveillance, militarism, and slavery

It's most likely too far gone at this point but just in case there is a chance I'm posting this

To the good people here and elsewhere, sail safe, we're in for some chop.

Anonymous ID: 000000 June 2, 2020, 11:33 a.m. No.9431692   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1722

>>9431610

>anyone know what he means here?

The original post is implying Trump holding a Bible is somehow state endorsing the church. It's an angry atheist looking for things to be pissed off about because 'anger' has been the drug of choice for the past decade or so.

Anonymous ID: 000000 June 2, 2020, 11:40 a.m. No.9431794   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9431722

>i guess he was showiing hypocrisy?

He was showing his ignorance and blind hatred of religion. His complaint was that Trump was using ('endorsing') the Bible, which he sees to be the state advocating for a specific religion. The poster was apparently unaware that every president (maybe not Hussein I don't remember) has placed their hand on a Bible to take their inaugural oath, so Trump holding one isn't the grievous Constitutional violation they think it is.