>>9432439, >>9432434 Anon calls out bakers for divisionfagging, asks all to go anon. WWG1WGA
BAKER NOTABLE
Lack of arguments mean you lose. No ip hopping here. You glow.
The same shit that's happening now. The same namefagging bakers wouldn't notable anything to do with things that went against their interests, and so the board cracked. New boards sprung up and anons went to boards where they could research rather than deal with bakers who were subverting the movement.
There was a ton of drama with BO and a lot of questions about bots etc. Was a crazy time.
Don't trust bakers, especially ones who call you a shill. Should be obvious, but somehow even anons want to submit to authority, even though the entire reason we're here is because almost every authority in this country (or even the world) has been compromised.
Hey baker you going to respond or glow? Your choice.
I hope the money is worth it. Remember what happens to traitors.
Your tears are delicious. Take a shit while you still can. Most people can't hold it after the floor drops from beneath them.
You're exposed. Your death will be a mercy.
Bakers are not above anons. Bakers are servants, and as such must respond to anons.
When you don't, you just prove you're an enemy.
Lurk moar newfag.
Start doing what retard? Baking and responding to anons and not acting like dictators?
Your retardation makes no sense. Go ask your JIDF handler for the next part of your script.