Anonymous ID: 21dc74 June 2, 2020, 2:45 p.m. No.9434979   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5035

Been digging the Lisa/MI6 thing. And it’s looking like not 2016/2016. Does it matter that LP was DOJ and not FBI at the time? So why did Q allow us to make an assumption about the year(s) that was wrong? Does Q always correct us if we are wrong in a dig? Have there been any prior instances in which Q will tag an anon’s comments though they are later shown to be not right? If Q will not correct us on a wrong decode as to the year, then why would Q correct us in our assumption that it is Lisa Page that has a deal? It’s going to come out soon that those pics are 2013/2014. LP was employed by DOJ. Not FBI. Working an organized crime case? Are we gonna get one of those. “We never said…” things from Q on this.

Anonymous ID: 21dc74 June 2, 2020, 3:10 p.m. No.9435323   🗄️.is 🔗kun

London pics[prev]

Year determined?

(Yes 2013/2014)

Relevant

2015/2016 <—(This about 2013)

(Don’t know what that is)