Been digging the Lisa/MI6 thing. And it’s looking like not 2016/2016. Does it matter that LP was DOJ and not FBI at the time? So why did Q allow us to make an assumption about the year(s) that was wrong? Does Q always correct us if we are wrong in a dig? Have there been any prior instances in which Q will tag an anon’s comments though they are later shown to be not right? If Q will not correct us on a wrong decode as to the year, then why would Q correct us in our assumption that it is Lisa Page that has a deal? It’s going to come out soon that those pics are 2013/2014. LP was employed by DOJ. Not FBI. Working an organized crime case? Are we gonna get one of those. “We never said…” things from Q on this.
Typo: 2016/2016 sb 2015/2016
London pics[prev]
Year determined?
(Yes 2013/2014)
Relevant
2015/2016 <—(This about 2013)
(Don’t know what that is)