>>9446005

Remember where you are, anon. This is a war zone and also a free speech board. The most often repeated ideas may not necessarily be the correct ones.

You have to think bigger. Mueller was the head of the FBI (new) when he signed for the rooms of the 9/11 hijackers. Think logically, why would the head of the FBI need to sign to authorize their rooms? Can the CIA operate domestically?

Mueller left the Marines after Vietnam to become a prosecutor. Why?

Anons are good at finding pieces of information, but do not be afraid to come up with your own opinions and hold them against mockery.

It's how I am almost always right.

Here… A treat for you and anons:

https://animebase.me/threads/dance-with-the-devil-history-of-al-qaeda.673543/

Apparently, they changed things up to require you to be logged in as a member to see links.

And even what is there is just the tip of the iceburg.

…. There is a warning I should give anons, but giving it means you'll do precisely what you aren't yet ready to handle. I'll simply say that if you find yourself surrounded by masked figures and are looking for people to show you things, you are in over your head and need to think carefully about what you're doing.

>>9446209

You're confusing what I am saying.

The game of DC isn't about putting bad people into positions. It is about leverage over people.

"Hey, hey, that classified operation you were a part of that had you go to Russia? … If you don't want to get indicted based on what is public about it, plus a little leak to the press… A slip of the tongue…"

That is how DC works.

Who knows where the bodies are buried?

Who was the head of the FBI for 12 years during the formation of the largest security state in human history?

If Carter Page was the target of a FISA warrant because his role as an informant was obscured - then others could be prosecuted for "crimes" that were actually only part of the story. Or leaks could be used to portray only part of the story and damage one's reputation.

Patriots do not share classified information, even when it would benefit them to do so. Not without it going through the proper channels.

>>9446263

To get people to look at it.

Also, imagine what would happen if the press decided to try and do a fact check of why he is wrong about undercover huber being a fraud.