>>9445764
I appreciate that you engage in a conversation with me. I understand why it's done and I don't agree with it.
>we've been doing that for 2 years. that's the basic first step of becoming a new baker.
I was here 2 years ago. I saw how it developed and I didn't agree with it then. The problem of this is, that a small group of Bakers can completely control who bakes and who doesn't. Many of the older bakers learned baking by simply baking. That's the best way to learn.
>you just want a completely lawless kitchen
I am honouring the spirit of Anonymous chan life, something which was the reason why precious Q started posting here. Chan life is inherently anarchist. Trying to create order in it, usually ends ups the other way.
>did that a month ago and we had a shill baker who fucked up the bake
It happens every so often and keeps people from getting complacent. If there's a shill baker, plenty of Anons pipe up and capture the dough.
You're probably one of the good Bakers, I can sense that; you're just surrounded by people who are not.