Anonymous ID: c5248a June 3, 2020, 1:35 p.m. No.9452961   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3034

Twitter flags Republican tweets for 'glorifying violence,' but leaves others untouched

 

The company's 'glorification of violence policy' appears unevenly enforced.

 

Twitter for several years has been at the forefront of one of the tech world's more intractable ongoing problems: To what extent do social media companies regulate the speech posted on their platforms? Most companies police user content to varying degrees. Facebook's "community standards," for instance, forbid an extensive range of posts from sexual content to "cruel and insensitive" material — though Twitter has for years overseen user posts in an arguably more hands-off manner: It allows sexually explicit content, for instance, while Facebook's recent censorship of anti-lockdown protest groups drove home its heavier hand of content regulation. Yet Twitter in recent weeks is indicating that it intends to increase regulation of at least some types of tweets: It has flagged several posts from prominent Republican politicians — including President Donald Trump — and claimed that their messages violate its terms of service regarding the "glorification of violence." While Twitter does in principle prohibit those types of tweets, the platform has shown that in practice, it accords far more leeway to violent rhetoric from non-Republicans.

 

President, GOP representative both get tweets flagged Last week, as the violent protests following the death of Minneapolis resident George Floyd began picking up steam throughout the country, Trump issued a scathing late-night tweet: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1266231100780744704

Twitter quickly slapped that tweet with a warning. "This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence," the company said, though it added that it had "determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the Tweet to remain accessible."

 

On its website, Twitter spells out the terms of the cited policy: "Glorifying violent acts could inspire others to take part in similar acts of violence," the company states. Under the policy, users "can’t glorify, celebrate, praise or condone violent crimes, violent events where people were targeted because of their membership in a protected group, or the perpetrators of such acts." Whether the president's tweet actually violated those terms is unclear: A martial response to civic destruction is not, on its face, a "violent crime," nor are looters themselves part of a "protected group." Twitter itself does not offer any explanation as to what part of Trump's tweet specifically triggered the violation, so users are left to guess. A tweet several days later from Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz was slapped with a similar warning. Following the president's declaration that the violent anarchist group Antifa would be designated a terrorist group by the United States government, Gaetz wrote on Twitter on Monday: https://twitter.com/mattgaetz/status/1267513356853919744

Now that we clearly see Antifa as terrorists, can we hunt them down like we do those in the Middle East?— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) June 1, 2020 That tweet, too, was hit with a violence-glorification policy violation, even though it did not specifically mention violence and again seemed to fall outside of the boundaries of the policy set by Twitter itself. "Big tech companies like Twitter appear to care more about the public’s perception of their brand than allowing free discourse on their platform," Gaetz told Just the News on Tuesday. "They have tilted the scales to editorialize and shape our conversations.” “The double standard exhibited by these tech giants is staggering. Twitter targets users like President Trump and myself when we promote the America First view that people should be held accountable for their violent actions but allow accounts espousing Antifa’s violent propaganda to remain online," he added. "We need to bring an end to this unacceptable hypocrisy by reforming the laws that give entities like Twitter so much protection.”

 

https://justthenews.com/nation/technology/twitter-flags-republican-tweets-glorifying-violence-leaves-others-untouched

Anonymous ID: c5248a June 3, 2020, 1:40 p.m. No.9453034   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9452961

 

(2 of 2)

 

Continued with supporting doc's

Twitter flags Republican tweets for 'glorifying violence,' but leaves others untouched

https://justthenews.com/nation/technology/twitter-flags-republican-tweets-glorifying-violence-leaves-others-untouched

 

Facebook blacklists Michigan quarantine protest group

https://disrn.com/news/facebook-blacklists-michigan-quarantine-protest-group

 

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1266231100780744704

 

Glorification of violence policy

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/glorification-of-violence

Anonymous ID: c5248a June 3, 2020, 1:47 p.m. No.9453209   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ex-Baltimore mayor, once convicted of embezzlement, now favorite to fill seat of mayor convicted of fraud

 

The Baltimore mayoral seat that was vacated last year when Catherine Pugh resigned over a corruption scandal which led to a three-year prison sentence now appears likely to be filled by a former mayor who has a past conviction of her own. With Democratic primary returns still coming in after Tuesday’s vote, the front-runner appears to be Sheila Dixon, who resigned as mayor in 2010 after a jury found her guilty of misdemeanor embezzlement for misappropriating gift cards for the poor. Dixon leads a pack of more than 20 Democratic candidates that includes current Acting Mayor Bernard C. “Jack” Young, who took office when Pugh stepped down in May 2019 amid allegations related to sales of her self-published children’s book. Pugh ultimately pleaded guilty in November to fraud, conspiracy, and tax-related charges, and in February was sentenced to three years in prison.

 

Current tallies are based on ballots that had been mailed in and dropped off before Tuesday, according to the Baltimore Sun, with Dixon having received approximately 30 percent of the roughly 75,000 votes that were released by the state elections board. In-person voting sites were delayed in reporting results because of long lines, the newspaper reported.

 

There were six voting sites in operation Tuesday, but most votes were expected to be cast by mail due to the coronavirus pandemic. This is the second time Dixon has tried to mount a political comeback. She ran in 2016, only to lose to Pugh in the Democratic primary. If Dixon wins Tuesday’s primary she is favored to win in November, given that Democrats outnumber Republicans 10-1 in the city.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sheila-dixon-mayor-replace-baltimore

Sheila Dixon leads Baltimore mayor’s race in early returns

https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/elections/bs-md-pol-mayor-20200602-32m5qdhaubepdc4cpk2iyyiw5i-story.html