Can I get some anons check http:// qanon.news to see if it's infected with malware?

It was claimed in an earlier bread that it was infected with malware and removed from the bread, but everything looks OK to me..

https:// rescan.pro/result.php?e4cb922b75db556a5c4bd0501f07ba3e

ping qanon.news = 50.52.168.151

https:// metadefender.opswat.com/results#!/ip/NTAuNTIuMTY4LjE1MQ==/overview

https:// app.webinspector.com/public/reports/81164825

Can we get this added back into the bread?

BAKER

Can I get some anons check http:// qanon.news to see if it's infected with malware?

It was claimed in an earlier bread that it was infected with malware and removed from the bread, but everything looks OK to me..

https:// rescan.pro/result.php?e4cb922b75db556a5c4bd0501f07ba3e

ping qanon.news = 50.52.168.151

https:// metadefender.opswat.com/results#!/ip/NTAuNTIuMTY4LjE1MQ==/overview

https:// app.webinspector.com/public/reports/81164825

Can we get this added back into the bread?

BAKER

>REPOST

Can I get some anons check http:// qanon.news?

Shill claimed in an earlier bread that it was infected with malware and got it removed from the bread, but everything looks OK to me..

https:// rescan.pro/result.php?e4cb922b75db556a5c4bd0501f07ba3e

ping qanon.news = 50.52.168.151

https:// metadefender.opswat.com/results#!/ip/NTAuNTIuMTY4LjE1MQ==/overview

https:// app.webinspector.com/public/reports/81164825

Can we get this added back into the bread?

>>945672

I didn't say BV was a shill. I said a shill said it was infected with malware and got it removed by the BV.

I know the address because it's my address. It's a resource.

>>945680

Desperation? No.

I am however interested in the ability for anons to find/use a resource I've spent alot of time putting together. You don't have to use it.

>>945750

>>945750

Wrong. I said that it was claimed that it was infected and got it removed from the bread. If the BV was the one that claimed it was infected then that's my bad. Theirs is a thankless job. I get it.

My point is that it is not in fact infected, but it was claimed to be and removed from the bread. Show me proof it's infected and I'll fix it.

>>945750

Hold on, 3rd party scripts? What are you talking about? jQuery? CSS?

>>945816

You'e thinking of a different anon. qanon.news The API is what I'm talking about. I just got on an hr or so ago.

>>945868

BAKER

>REPOST

Can I get some anons check for malware http:// qanon.news?

Everything looks OK to me..

https:// rescan.pro/result.php?e4cb922b75db556a5c4bd0501f07ba3e

ping qanon.news = 50.52.168.151

https:// metadefender.opswat.com/results#!/ip/NTAuNTIuMTY4LjE1MQ==/overview

https:// app.webinspector.com/public/reports/81164825

Can we get this added back into the bread?