>>9458570 lb
>it was a high speed data transmission
>exactly 10khz wide
10 kHz is NOT a wide bandwidth transmission.
It's just slightly wider than a standard SSB transmission, which is much narrower than AM or FM. So that statement is bullshit.
The article you liked so much also contained some other easily-spotted bullshit where terminology was used incorrectly.
This statement for example is ridiculous:
>encrypted bandwidth communication but theres only a few KNOWN locations in the world that have that transmitting ability โ so something unknown, secretive, or mysterious
Bandwidth does not get encrypted; signals get encrypted.
But there are many places that can transmit high power signals and can encrypt them
and F-layer propagation is not a big deal
Maybe you should return to reddit.