Anonymous ID: 1db20b June 4, 2020, 8:14 a.m. No.9464873   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ubiquity is a science new to me, so I'm not sure if I'm asking this properly. Kind of goes with the infoAnons who post.

Everything in life travels thru a series of nexuses. And ubiquity reigns.

We know goog operates by algos and if you goog something, you get goog responses according to what goog wants you to see. Most of that is based on what is most popularly clicked on. There's little bias, at least of a political nature. People end up going to sites that everyone else tends to go to.

That leaves out plenty. Especially when it comes to sites that espouse alternative views.

It seems to me that anything POTUS would attempt would have to find a way to bypass that system.

But nexuses just exist and the entire web system is a map of nexuses. Mass communication cannot operate any other way.

Any thoughts, anons? Thanks.

Anonymous ID: 1db20b June 4, 2020, 8:46 a.m. No.9465251   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5266 >>5278

>>9465203

Sen. Whitehouse is babbling his usual idiocy now. Can't even listen. Dems are trying to dilute the entire matter. They do not want a replay of Watergate. Entropy rules with these thugs.

"Put it in a larger context… don't overlook all the other issues that matter… set up more committees…" That's their way. NEVER look at specific situations of corruption. because then you have to nail someone in particular.

Just babble on about generalities and concepts. That's marxist, too.

A case could be made for not putting the country thru a Watergate hearing scenario. I was glued to the TV the summer of 1973 watching those hearings. They led to Nixon's resignation, partly because (not justice!) but because people just want the damn thing shut down so they can get on with their measly lives. The same will happen here, more than ever. People disgusted and exhausted with all the attacks on America.

I really question POTUS' approach at this point. Guess we jsut need to pray more!

Anonymous ID: 1db20b June 4, 2020, 8:56 a.m. No.9465343   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5411

>>9465316

We've had hints from Q for a couple years that plenty of DS crooks have been singing.

Yet here's an interesting dynamic. All these people who are implicated in the coup, they're still sitting on the fence. They're playing both sides - JUST IN CASE the prez doesn't come out ahead. Or they're just playing their roles. Not sure. It's just hard to feel fully confident that our side will come out ahead. And it's not like we have less of a stake in this either.

They'll possibly go to Gitmo, but our lives are ruined by all this too.

Anonymous ID: 1db20b June 4, 2020, 9:04 a.m. No.9465449   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9465395

Your focus is wrong. It's about the issues.

Qanon has brought us together to learn and then disseminate what we learn about our world, especially in DC. Don't try to convince anyone of Q's veracity. Talk to them about what we do have verifiable proof of. Tons of that available. But you'd have start doing some research and compiling yourself. We're not here to baby you. The Plan comes together as we do what we're each individually capable of doing.