>>9466043 (pb)
>There is not set 'policy' about baker handoffs
my point exactly
that baker dragging me into that argument was noted and refuted
I also noticed there was no reply from NGLZYZQX (the baker in question)
>>9466043 (pb)
>There is not set 'policy' about baker handoffs
my point exactly
that baker dragging me into that argument was noted and refuted
I also noticed there was no reply from NGLZYZQX (the baker in question)